2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reassessment of the cefaclor breakpoint for Streptococcus pneumoniae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) Cefaclor reduced gold nanoparticles used after 5 days of synthesis showed 100% antibacterial activity, although pure cefaclor has a half-life of ca. 9 h with 11% activity in solution, 88 indicating gold nanoparticles enhance the half-life and the activity of cefaclor. (4) Cefaclor and gold nanoparticles alone have low antibacterial effects compared to cefaclor reduced gold nanoparticles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Cefaclor reduced gold nanoparticles used after 5 days of synthesis showed 100% antibacterial activity, although pure cefaclor has a half-life of ca. 9 h with 11% activity in solution, 88 indicating gold nanoparticles enhance the half-life and the activity of cefaclor. (4) Cefaclor and gold nanoparticles alone have low antibacterial effects compared to cefaclor reduced gold nanoparticles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we carried out studies which demonstrated the instability of cefaclor in vitro, relative to the more stable compound cefuroxime 1 . Bioassays showed that cefuroxime had a half-life of >24 hours and lost 34% activity over 24 hours, whereas cefaclor had a half-life of approximately 9 hours and lost 88% activity over 24 hours 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioassays showed that cefuroxime had a half-life of >24 hours and lost 34% activity over 24 hours, whereas cefaclor had a half-life of approximately 9 hours and lost 88% activity over 24 hours 1 . We also showed how this instability led to the determination of falsely high pneumococcal minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) by standard NCCLS methodology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%