“…A new approach -which required the selection of a main singlesection stratotype, supplemented by auxiliary sections to better define the range of variability associated with the boundary interval -was discussed during the Subcommission Meeting at the 10th International Symposium on the Cretaceous in Vienna in 2017. Furthermore, Silke Voigt presented an updated, high-resolution carbon isotope chemostratigraphy for Salzgitter-Salder and its possible correlation with Słupia Nadbrzeżna, which suggested that the hiatus at the base of the C. deformis erectus Zone (basal Coniacian) was much smaller than previously interpreted, or even non-existent -that is, the basal Coniacian in Salzgitter-Salder was continuous (Voigt et al, 2021). Finally, new inoceramid collections from the boundary interval showed that C. deformis erectus (Meek), the boundary marker, first appears slightly lower than previously documented (already in Bed 46 instead of Bed 47), which made the correlation to the Słupia Nadbrzeżna succession straightforward (here and in Voigt et al, 2021).…”