2022
DOI: 10.1080/10999922.2021.2014223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recalibrating Public Service: Valuing Engagement, Empathy, Social Equity, and Ethics in Public Administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linking social equity as a solution to improved governance will be key. Dolamore and Whitebread (2022) suggest "recalibrating public service" by focusing on a new set of 4E's: engagement, empathy, equity, and ethics. By incorporating these new values to the traditional values in public service (i.e., economy, efficiency, effectiveness, and equity), practitioners and researchers can emphasize principles in democratic governance, where government not only looks like those they serve but seeks to understand the evolving needs of diverse groups (Norman-Major, 2022).…”
Section: Social Equity In Public Administration: Future (Post-2023)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linking social equity as a solution to improved governance will be key. Dolamore and Whitebread (2022) suggest "recalibrating public service" by focusing on a new set of 4E's: engagement, empathy, equity, and ethics. By incorporating these new values to the traditional values in public service (i.e., economy, efficiency, effectiveness, and equity), practitioners and researchers can emphasize principles in democratic governance, where government not only looks like those they serve but seeks to understand the evolving needs of diverse groups (Norman-Major, 2022).…”
Section: Social Equity In Public Administration: Future (Post-2023)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pedagogical choices are hugely influential in creating a balanced, diverse, and inclusive educational experience (Addy et al, 2021; Finkelstein et al, 2021; Harris et al, 2020; Hogan & Sathy, 2022; Mason et al, 2020). At the same time, they may reveal subtle or unintentional practices that could result in inequitable outcomes in public service praxis, such as perpetuating White male/Eurocentric, ableist, philanthropic/savior perspectives, treated as endemic in the nonprofit literature (Dolamore & Whitebread, 2022; Feit & Sandberg, 2022). The literature, thus far, speaks to some of this—but this article fills this gap with our broad examination of how social equity values such as diversity or inclusion are made visible in syllabi.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%