Recalibrating the evolution versus creationism debate for student learning: towards students’ evaluation of evidence in an argumentation task

Abstract

There is substantial body of literature in science education focusing on students' understanding of the theory of evolution by natural selection. However, despite decades of research on the evolution versus creationism debate there is still widespread concern that particular misconceptions about evolution persist. The study aimed to recalibrate the evolution versus creationism debate by engaging students in an argumentation task where students can interpret evidence and reasons for why either position is justified or not, and on what basis. A card sort activity used to investigate the students' use of evidence and reasons. A sample of 77 students with an average age of 13 participated in the study in England in the context of a funded research project. The findings pointed to challenges and opportunities in teaching and learning of evolution through an argumentation task where alternative perspectives are drawn from both science and religious education. Furthermore, they illustrated how argumentation tasks can potentially provide a context for students to explore crosssubject topics. Research about the immersion of students in tasks that support their argumentation can generate understanding of students' reasoning, and ultimately such research may lead to the design of lesson resources to support students' engagement in science.

The Impact of Inquiry-Based Online Learning With Virtual Laboratories on Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skills

“…Scientific argumentation is a higher-order thinking skill that is the main focus of education in the 21st century (Guilfoyle & Erduran, 2021;Noviyanti et al, 2021). This is also one of the core practices that must be implemented in science learning (Loper et al, 2019;Mao et al, 2018;Mikeska & Lottero-Perdue, 2022).…”

Science and RE teachers' perspectives on the purpose of RE on the secondary school curriculum in England

“…A persuasive distinction between ‘powerful knowledge’ and ‘knowledge of the powerful’ (Young, 2008) led to social realist ideas influencing both policy and pedagogy (Hoadley et al, 2019), with an impact on the demands of Ofsted, examination specifications and curriculum planning and resources. In parallel to this renewed focus on knowledge in curriculum subjects, various academic research projects have explored how the discrete curricular school subjects, science and RE, might work together in a rigorous, interdisciplinary way to explore important topics, such as medical ethics or artificial intelligence, that may fall across established curriculum subjects (see Billingsley et al, 2018; Guilfoyle & Erduran, 2021; Pearce et al, 2021). Within current debates on the place of knowledge in the curriculum in England and beyond (Muller & Young, 2019; Niemelä, 2020), less is known about how knowledge works across disciplinary boundaries.…”

Too Philosophical, Therefore Useless for Science Education?

“…Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP) has been used in numerous studies in educational research as a tool for analysing arguments in educational settings (e.g. Cebrián-Robles et al, 2018 ) including in the context of big questions such as evolution and creationism (Guilfoyle & Erduran, 2021 ). TAP has been utilised as a teaching and learning heuristic (e.g.…”