2001
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2001)127:4(317)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recalibration of a Reaeration Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scatter diagram presented in Fig. 3 also shows that the scatter between the observed and modelled values is far less for the ANN than for the approach by Thackston & Dawson (2001). It can be seen that the ANN performs very well for lower K 2 , but for high K 2 it underestimates values.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The scatter diagram presented in Fig. 3 also shows that the scatter between the observed and modelled values is far less for the ANN than for the approach by Thackston & Dawson (2001). It can be seen that the ANN performs very well for lower K 2 , but for high K 2 it underestimates values.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, overestimation of K 2 may mislead the water resources planners into removal of pollutants and expenditure involved in its treatment. Table 4 Performance evaluation of re-aeration equations for data sets used by Thackston & Dawson (2001) The data set used by Thackston & Dawson (2001) was also analysed in this study. However, not all the data used by them were available to the authors-only 184 patterns were available.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations