Recall of recent lunch and its effect on subsequent snack intake

Higgs, Suzanne; Williamson, Amy; Attwood, Angela

doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.02.011

Cited by 94 publications

(88 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Related to our study and the study done by Wilkinson et al are the studies conducted by Higgs et al (Higgs, 2002;Higgs, Williamson, & Attwood, 2008). Higgs demonstrated that thinking back about a recent lunch impact subsequent snack intake (i.e.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 73%

High satiety expectations of a first course promote selection of less energy in a main course picture task

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 73%

High satiety expectations of a first course promote selection of less energy in a main course picture task

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Ten minutes after meal termination, distracted participants reported greater hunger and less fullness (13). Furthermore, memory for food in one meal appears to reduce intake at a subsequent meal (14,15). One possibility is that these findings reflect a general role for memory of recent eating in the regulation of appetite and food intake (16).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Playing a computer game during lunch affects fullness, memory for lunch, and later snack intake

Oldham-Cooper

Hardman

Nicoll

et al. 2011

The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

120

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It has been reported that manipulating memories for recent eating affects future consumption decisions (for reviews see Higgs, 2005Higgs, , 2008. For example, boosting memories of recent eating via explicit recall of the last meal reduces food intake (Higgs, 2002;Higgs, Williamson, & Attwood, 2008). On the other hand, amnesic patients, who are unable to remember eating, eat multiple meals in quick succession (Hebben, Corkin, Eichenbaum, & Shedlack, 1985;Higgs, Williamson, Rotshtein, & Humphreys, 2008;Rozin, Dow, Moscovitch, & Rajaram, 1998).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Manipulations of attention during eating and their effects on later snack intake

Higgs

2015

Appetite

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Manipulation of attention during eating has been reported to affect later consumption via changes in meal memory. The aim of the present studies was to examine the robustness of these effects and investigate moderating factors. Across three studies, attention to eating was manipulated via distraction (via a computer game or TV watching) or focusing of attention to eating, and effects on subsequent snack consumption and meal memory were assessed. The participants were predominantly lean, young women students and the designs were between-subjects. Distraction increased later snack intake and this effect was larger when participants were more motivated to engage with the distracter and were offset when the distractor included food-related cues. Attention to eating reduced later snacking and this effect was larger when participants imagined eating from their own perspective than when they imagined eating from a third person perspective. Meal memory was impaired after distraction but focusing on eating did not affect later meal memory, possibly explained by ceiling effects for the memory measure. The pattern of results suggests that attention manipulations during eating have robust effects on later eating and the effect sizes are medium to large. The data are consistent with previous reports and add to the literature by suggesting that type of attention manipulation is important in determining effects on later eating. The results further suggest that attentive eating may be a useful target in interventions to help with appetite control.

show abstract

Recall of recent lunch and its effect on subsequent snack intake

Cited by 94 publications

References 36 publications

High satiety expectations of a first course promote selection of less energy in a main course picture task

High satiety expectations of a first course promote selection of less energy in a main course picture task

Playing a computer game during lunch affects fullness, memory for lunch, and later snack intake

Manipulations of attention during eating and their effects on later snack intake

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About