1997
DOI: 10.1109/68.588209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receiver sensitivity improvement by impulsive coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The power penalty for both formats is 0.7 dB for the 10 Gbit/s rate, 338 diffraction angle and 5 mm aperture size. The experiments show a back-to-back BER difference of 1.9 dB for RZ compared to NRZ consistent with theory [5]. The eye diagrams for RZ and NRZ shown in Fig.…”
Section: Modsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The power penalty for both formats is 0.7 dB for the 10 Gbit/s rate, 338 diffraction angle and 5 mm aperture size. The experiments show a back-to-back BER difference of 1.9 dB for RZ compared to NRZ consistent with theory [5]. The eye diagrams for RZ and NRZ shown in Fig.…”
Section: Modsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…As noted by Personick [39] in 1973, and more recently, demonstrated by Boivin et al [343], such techniques can lead to several dB enhancement of RX sensitivity. Discussion of the transmitter considerations of using such waveforms is given in section 3.5.5, and we elaborate on the use of this class of waveforms in section 5.1 for preamplified receivers.…”
Section: Direct Detection-pinmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The ability to maintain transmission efficiency over a wide range of duty cycles, which is facilitated by high-gain and average-power limited properties of optical amplifiers [11,[343][344][345][346], allows for aggressive pulse shaping at the transmitter. This can improve receiver sensitivity and provide flexible multi-rate capabilities with simplified receiver design options [11,12,15], a subject discussed below and further in section 5.…”
Section: High Power Optical Amplifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, receiver performance is limited by the thermal noise floor of the avalanche photodiode (APD), so the use of high-peak-power low-duty-cycle waveforms provides a means of improving the detected signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) given an average-power-limited source. 7,8 In addition, since the number of bits per symbol grows as the PPM symbol size M is increased (and corresponding duty cycle is decreased), this also improves the receiver sensitivity as measured in photons/bit. 9 As a result, changes in waveform duty cycle M are are selected as the primary means through which the system adapts to changing link conditions.…”
Section: Transmitter Design Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%