2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016gl069564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receiver structure from teleseisms: Autocorrelation and cross correlation

Abstract: We present a way of characterizing the structure beneath a seismic station, by exploiting stacked correlograms of three‐component records from teleseismic events. This seismic daylight imaging approach exploits the extraction of reflection and conversion information from teleseismic coda via tensor autocorrelation. The approach is illustrated for a number of Australian stations in a variety of tectonic environments using hundreds of teleseismic events, to extract P and S reflectivity and converted Ps and Sp in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This slowness can be determined as a function of epicentral distance and source depth. The delay time of the P wave reflection 2p is (e.g., Sun & Kennett, ) t2p=tPpPptPp=2H0.25em1vP2β2=2HcosiPvP, where H and v P are the ice layer thickness and its compressional wave speed and i P is the oblique angle of incidence at the surface. When the epicentral distance decreases, the P wave incidence deviates more from the vertical (i.e., larger i P ) and so the delay time t 2 p decreases monotonously.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This slowness can be determined as a function of epicentral distance and source depth. The delay time of the P wave reflection 2p is (e.g., Sun & Kennett, ) t2p=tPpPptPp=2H0.25em1vP2β2=2HcosiPvP, where H and v P are the ice layer thickness and its compressional wave speed and i P is the oblique angle of incidence at the surface. When the epicentral distance decreases, the P wave incidence deviates more from the vertical (i.e., larger i P ) and so the delay time t 2 p decreases monotonously.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several authors have been utilizing the autocorrelation principle to a large volume of continuous ambient noise records to extract near-vertical reflections from subsurface discontinuities (Becker & Knapmeyer-Endrun, 2018;Gorbatov et al, 2013;Kennett et al, 2015;Oren & Nowack, 2017;Saygin et al, 2017), the approach relying on earthquakes introduces two main advantages. First, because the incidence of P waves arriving from distance earthquakes is near vertical, it facilitates the extraction of desired vertical reflectivity (Ruigrok & Wapenaar, 2012;Sun & Kennett, 2016). Consequently, the coda processing requires significantly smaller data volume as well as computational resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we should emphasize that our approach does not depend on conversions between wave types and allows access to a wide range of frequencies. Also, except for very complex near‐surface structures, the reflections extracted from autocorrelations are less contaminated by the free surface multiples compared to the receiver functions (Kennett et al, ; Kennett & Sippl, ; Sun & Kennett, ). Therefore, the inversion of these data can be more feasible than the inversion of receiver functions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the success of many studies on the processing and/or forward modeling of autocorrelograms (e.g., Becker & Knapmeyer-Endrun, 2018;Clayton, 2018;Daneshvar et al, 1995;Gorbatov et al, 2013;Heath et al, 2018;Ito & Shiomi, 2012;Kennett et al, 2015;Kennett & Sippl, 2018;Nishitsuji et al, 2016;Oren & Nowack, 2017;Pham & Tkalčić, 2017, 2018Romero & Schimmel, 2018;Ruigrok & Wapenaar, 2012;Saygin et al, 2017;Sun & Kennett, 2016Sun et al, 2018;Taylor et al, 2016;Tibuleac & von Seggern, 2012), to our best knowledge, there are no published studies on the inversion of autocorrelograms for mapping major discontinuities in the crust and upper mantle. Here, we investigate the inversion of autocorrelograms for crustal imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the coda and noise cross correlations, the autocorrelation of the seismic noise and teleseismic earthquake coda, and reverberations to extract reflectivity response beneath a seismic station, has been demonstrated across Australia, Europe, Indonesia, Turkey, and the whole Earth by multiple studies of Becker and Knapmeyer Endrun (), Gorbatov et al (), Kennett (), Phạm and Tkalčić (), Poli et al (), Ruigrok and Wapenaar (), Saygin et al (), Sun and Kennett (), Sun et al (), and Taylor et al (). In all of these studies, the body wave reflectivity response of the Earth beneath a seismic station is extracted and used in inferring the underlying structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%