2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0922.2009.01341_32.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receiving the Gift of Friendship: Profound Disability, Theological Anthropology, and Ethics – By Hans S. Reinders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These statements correspond with the outcome of a previous study in which family members of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities mentioned that their child or sibling, according to them, is not able to make friends (Lahaije et al, 2023). Other studies, on the other hand, indicate that, despite the severity of their disabilities, persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities are capable of building and maintaining meaningful relationships that are essential for them to express their needs and feelings and gain control over their daily lives (Hauwert, 2018;Reinders, 2008;Vlaskamp & van der Putten, 2009). These relationships could also be advantageous for others, for example, in valuing vulnerability and dependency (Hughes et al, 2011;Reinders, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These statements correspond with the outcome of a previous study in which family members of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities mentioned that their child or sibling, according to them, is not able to make friends (Lahaije et al, 2023). Other studies, on the other hand, indicate that, despite the severity of their disabilities, persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities are capable of building and maintaining meaningful relationships that are essential for them to express their needs and feelings and gain control over their daily lives (Hauwert, 2018;Reinders, 2008;Vlaskamp & van der Putten, 2009). These relationships could also be advantageous for others, for example, in valuing vulnerability and dependency (Hughes et al, 2011;Reinders, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies, on the other hand, indicate that, despite the severity of their disabilities, persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities are capable of building and maintaining meaningful relationships that are essential for them to express their needs and feelings and gain control over their daily lives (Hauwert, 2018; Reinders, 2008; Vlaskamp & van der Putten, 2009). These relationships could also be advantageous for others, for example, in valuing vulnerability and dependency (Hughes et al, 2011; Reinders, 2008). Moreover, our study also showed that adding multiple and varied practical examples to the instrument helped to formulate concepts that initially seemed unfeasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Euro-American ideals of individual autonomy and self-determination, alongside cultural celebrations of achievement, can abrasively rub up against the lived realities of those with disabilities and relationships marked by profound interdependence (Landsman, 2009), where a child might require a high level of care for the rest of their lives. As Hans S. Reinders (2008) points out, our view of life's worth depends very much on our interpretation of a good life and how we understand our own being as humans.…”
Section: The Emotional Distribution Of Disability and Facilitated Dec...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropological scholarship on disability is not new, and in recent years, anthropologists have explored a wide array of topics, ranging from kinship (Addlakha, 2020;Rapp & Ginsburg, 2011;Sargent, 2021), community (Green, 2014;Ryan Idriss, 2021), andreligion (McKearney, 2018;Reinders, 2008) to scientific, media, and medical institutions (Ginsburg & Rapp, 2013;Hartblay, 2020). In India, anthropologists have analyzed specific experiences of impairment and disability with respect to gender, familial care, the state, and neoliberal structures (Friedner, 2015;Ghosh & Banerjee, 2017;Staples, 2005).…”
Section: Disability and Sexuality: A Brief Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%