We present a technique for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft with preserved tibial insertions. The tendons, harvested with an open-ended tendon stripper while their tibial insertions are preserved, are looped around to prepare a quadrupled graft. The femoral tunnel is drilled independently through a transportal technique, whereas the tibial tunnel is drilled in a standard manner. The length of the quadrupled graft and loop of the RetroButton is adjusted so that it matches the calculated length of both tunnels and the intra-articular part of the proposed ACL graft. After the RetroButton is flipped, the graft is manually tensioned with maximal stretch on the free end, which is then sutured to the other end with preserved insertions. We propose that preserving the insertions is more biological and may provide better proprioception. The technique eliminates the need for a tibial-side fixation device, thus reducing the cost of surgery. Furthermore, tibial-side fixation of the free graft is the weakest link in the overall stiffness of the reconstructed ACL, and this technique circumvents this problem. Postoperative mechanical stability and functional outcome with this technique need to be explored and compared with those of ACL reconstruction using free hamstring autograft.T he most common surgical treatment for an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)edeficient knee is reconstruction of the ligament using an autograft, either a quadrupled semitendinosus and gracilis (STG) tendon free hamstring graft or a free boneepatellar tendonebone graft.1 The objective mechanical stability of a reconstructed ACL ranges from 85% to 90%, 2 and this has correlated poorly with functional outcome; lack of proprioception is thought to be one of the reasons for poor correlation.3-7 Furthermore, tibial-side fixation of the free graft has been observed to be the weakest link in the overall stiffness of the construct of the reconstructed ACL. 8,9 We hypothesized that using a technique that preserves the insertions of the hamstring tendons on the tibial side would eliminate the disadvantages of a free graft, such as poor proprioception, tibial-side fixation being the weakest link in the overall construct, and the added cost of using a tibial-side fixation device for a free graft.