2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in 3D bioprinted cartilage-mimicking constructs for applications in tissue engineering

Jian Zhou,
Qi Li,
Zhuang Tian
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 195 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 As a result, the development of microtissue arrays using 3D biological printing technology has attracted significant attention. 18 According to the ASTM standard, 3D bio-printing technology can be divided into jetting-based, extrusion-based 19 and vat photopolymerization-based bioprinting. 20 For different applications, the appropriate printing method should be selected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 As a result, the development of microtissue arrays using 3D biological printing technology has attracted significant attention. 18 According to the ASTM standard, 3D bio-printing technology can be divided into jetting-based, extrusion-based 19 and vat photopolymerization-based bioprinting. 20 For different applications, the appropriate printing method should be selected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 22–24 ] However, most reported 3D‐printed cartilage scaffolds require in vitro co‐cultivation with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) to facilitate articular cartilage defect repair. [ 25,26 ] Some researchers have developed a 3D scaffold construct consisting of a BMSC internal repository that mimics the bone marrow lumen by encapsulating stem cells, functionalized with peptide modifications to promote cell migration into externally differentiation‐induced 3D‐printed units, and facilitated regeneration of osteochondral units in a rabbit model. [ 27 ] But this approach adds the step of in vitro culture, making the repair process cumbersome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other studies, this cumbersome approach also prolonged the repair time. [ 25,26 ] Furthermore, in vitro cultivation of BMSCs can compromise their stemness and homing ability, often leading to uncontrolled contamination. [ 28–30 ] Consequently, this hampers the rapid personalized customization of cartilage tissue engineering and its implementation in clinical settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%