2020
DOI: 10.1515/revac-2020-0121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in animal origin identification of gelatin-based products using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods: A mini review

Abstract: Gelatin, a natural functional material obtained from animal connective tissues, has been broadly applied in health-related products such as food, pharmacy, and cosmetic. But unclear labelling and false information of animal origin of gelatin in those products would violate religious rules and increase public health risks. Recently, animal origin identification of gelatin-based products has drawn more and more concerns. Among various identification methods, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) has sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative LOD value for detecting porcine gelatin in bovine gelatin ranged from 0.09% to 0.89%. To estimate the unknown concentration of gelatin-based products in food systems, a high R2 value linear regression or calibration equation based on the relationship between the peak area of marker peptides (y) and gelatin content (x) can be utilized (Huang et al, 2020;Sha et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2018). The area under the chromatographic elution profile of the identified peptides can be compared between samples for relative quantitation (Xie et al, 2011).…”
Section: Detection Of Porcine Gelatin Markers In Adulterated Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative LOD value for detecting porcine gelatin in bovine gelatin ranged from 0.09% to 0.89%. To estimate the unknown concentration of gelatin-based products in food systems, a high R2 value linear regression or calibration equation based on the relationship between the peak area of marker peptides (y) and gelatin content (x) can be utilized (Huang et al, 2020;Sha et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2018). The area under the chromatographic elution profile of the identified peptides can be compared between samples for relative quantitation (Xie et al, 2011).…”
Section: Detection Of Porcine Gelatin Markers In Adulterated Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the traditional content determination methods are destructive, time consuming, and environment polluting with few other shortcomings and only applies to small samples and cannot meet the requirements of online monitoring [12]. In addition, the traditional methods of origin identifcation include liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [13], gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [14], molecular biology techniques [15], stable isotope [16], and chemical fngerprinting [17]. However, traditional chemical methods have high accuracy but also have some disadvantages, such as high detection cost, difcult operation, and time consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 However, the usage of gelatin in food such as trifles, candy corn, and gummy bears isolated from porcine and bovine have major religious and ethical concerns across the globe, including among Muslim and Jewish. 5,6 Further, the current trend of practicing vegetarian and vegan lifestyles does not support the application of gelatin in different products from animal sources. 7 Whilst ELISA, 8 Chromatography, 9 Mass spectroscopy, 10 Infrared-spectroscopy, 11 and PCR based methods are currently available to detect gelatin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 However, the usage of gelatin in food such as trifles, candy corn, and gummy bears isolated from porcine and bovine has major religious and ethical concerns across the globe, especially among Muslims and Jews. 5,6 Further, the current trend of practicing vegetarian and vegan lifestyles does not support the use of gelatin in different products from animal sources. 7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%