2013
DOI: 10.3390/s130201763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Advances in Bacteriophage Based Biosensors for Food-Borne Pathogen Detection

Abstract: Foodborne diseases are a major health concern that can have severe impact on society and can add tremendous financial burden to our health care systems. Rapid early detection of food contamination is therefore relevant for the containment of food-borne pathogens. Conventional pathogen detection methods, such as microbiological and biochemical identification are time-consuming and laborious, while immunological or nucleic acid-based techniques require extensive sample preparation and are not amenable to miniatu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
201
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
201
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The phage S16 LTF-MBs were unaffected by excess background flora or variable buffer pH and salt concentrations (pH 4 to 9 and 0 to 1 M NaCl). This validates their suitability for in situ detection of Salmonella and seems superior to the more pH-sensitive and cross-reactivity-prone immunosorbent-based tests (17,61).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phage S16 LTF-MBs were unaffected by excess background flora or variable buffer pH and salt concentrations (pH 4 to 9 and 0 to 1 M NaCl). This validates their suitability for in situ detection of Salmonella and seems superior to the more pH-sensitive and cross-reactivity-prone immunosorbent-based tests (17,61).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A negligible amount of TMB conversion was observed for the buffer-only control, with an A 450 value of 0.24 Ϯ 0.05, suggesting that a residual amount of HRP-LTF remained after washing; this was set as the background value of the assay. ELLTA was sensitive and the results statistically significant down to 10 2 CFU · ml Ϫ1 (A 450 of 0.77 Ϯ 0.18; t test with buffer-only control, P Ͻ 0.001), similar to other phage-and phage-encoded protein-based assays with detection limits ranging between 10 and 10 4 CFU · ml Ϫ1 (17). While the value for the lowest Salmonella concentration tested, 10 CFU · ml Ϫ1 (A 450 of 0.36 Ϯ 0.10), was higher than the value for the blank-only control (A 450 of 0.24), there was no statistical difference between the two values (P Ͼ 0.05).…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For biosensor purposes, bacteriophages have found utility as biorecognition agents for bacteria given the high degree of specificity and stability relative to antibodies (A. Singh, Poshtiban, & Evoy, 2013). Bacteriophages have also been used as biorecognition elements for a broader spectrum of targets through advances in phage display (Leeet al, 2013).…”
Section: Alternative Biorecognition Elements Bacteriophages and Recepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particular consideration should be given to the recognition type of the bioreceptor and the immobilization method. The selection of bioreceptors should be based on their ability to bind specific target materials and should consider their capacity for immobilization (Singh et al, 2013). Kisukuri and Andrade (2015).…”
Section: Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%