2018
DOI: 10.1002/bit.26856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in biosensors for diagnosis of celiac disease: A review

Abstract: Celiac disease (CD) is an intestinal issue activated by the inappropriate immune reaction towards gluten protein of wheat, rye, barley, oats, and autoantigen, tissue transglutaminase. Regardless of the accessibility of immunochemical conventions for research facility analysis of CD, there is as yet a need of speedier, less expensive, and simpler devices for diagnosing CD. This review concentrates on progresses in biosensors for diagnosing CD in perspective of the scaled down hardware, multianalyte discovery an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The affinity biosensors make a reaction complex between the analyte and bioreceptor, whereas the catalytic one directly reacts with the analyte (Nguyen et al, 2019). Affinity biosensors come to be of three types: DNA sensors (Debnath et al, 2010), immune‐based sensors (Gupta et al, 2019), and receptor sensors (Rocchitta et al, 2016). First, different DNA sensors are reported which are based on peptide nucleic acids, aptamers of DNA and RNA, and artificially synthesized nucleic acid molecules as bioreceptors (Jolly et al, 2016; Ozer et al, 2019; Qureshi et al, 2010; Zhang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Biosensors and Its Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The affinity biosensors make a reaction complex between the analyte and bioreceptor, whereas the catalytic one directly reacts with the analyte (Nguyen et al, 2019). Affinity biosensors come to be of three types: DNA sensors (Debnath et al, 2010), immune‐based sensors (Gupta et al, 2019), and receptor sensors (Rocchitta et al, 2016). First, different DNA sensors are reported which are based on peptide nucleic acids, aptamers of DNA and RNA, and artificially synthesized nucleic acid molecules as bioreceptors (Jolly et al, 2016; Ozer et al, 2019; Qureshi et al, 2010; Zhang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Biosensors and Its Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immuno-sensors possess some unique advantages, such as intrinsic specificities, high sensitivity, free of interference from scattered light, and low cost [13][14][15], rendering them more suitable for detection of estrogeneous chemicals in complex environmental conditions than other sensors. Immunosensing strategy is the most widely used method in biomolecular detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miniaturized biodetection tools based on biosensor technologies are suitable for the detection of traces of gluten/gliadin in food. Biosensors have two main components: a physical transducer (electrochemical, piezoelectric, calorimetric or optical) and a biological receptor (enzyme, antibody, DNA, cells) [25][26][27][28][29][30]. An important issue in the construction of sensitive and stable biosensors concern the choice of solid substrate that will serve for the specific detection of analyte(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%