REVIEW
434Radiological features of uncommon aneurysms of the cardiovascular system COPYRIGHT © 2016 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. Articles published by this Open-Access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license.
SPECIAL STATEMENTAll articles published in journals owned by the Baishideng Publishing Group (BPG) represent the views and opinions of their authors, and not the views, opinions or policies of the BPG, except where otherwise explicitly indicated. WJR covers topics concerning diagnostic radiology, radiation oncology, radiologic physics, neuroradiology, nuclear radiology, pediatric radiology, vascular/interventional radiology, medical imaging achieved by various modalities and related methods analysis. The current columns of WJR include editorial, frontier, diagnostic advances, therapeutics advances, field of vision, mini-reviews, review, topic highlight, medical ethics, original articles, case report, clinical case conference (clinicopathological conference), and autobiography.
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORSWe encourage authors to submit their manuscripts to WJR. We will give priority to manuscripts that are supported by major national and international foundations and those that are of great basic and clinical significance.World Journal of Radiology is now indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central.
I-IIIEditorial Board Author contributions: Mazzei MA, Guerrini S, Mazzei FG, Cioffi Squitieri N, Notaro D, de Donato G, Galzerano G, Sacco P and Setacci F made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study, and acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data; Mazzei MA, Guerrini S and Setacci C contributed to drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content; Mazzei MA, Volterrani L and Setacci C approved the final version to be published.
AIM AND SCOPEInstitutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the University of Siena Institutional Review Board.Clinical trial registration statement: None.Informed consent statement: All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.Conflict-of-interest statement: None.
RESULTS:Among 163 patients 33 presented complications at CTA. DTA and CTA correlated for the presence of complications in 32/33 (96.96%) patients and for the absence of complications in 127/130 (97.69%) patients; the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of DTA were 97%, 98%, 91%, 99%, and 98%, respectively. CEUS and CTA correlated for the presence of complications in 19/33 (57.57%) patients and for the absence of complications in 129/130 (99.23%) patients; the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of CEUS were 58%, 99%, 95%, 90%, and 91%, respectively. Sensitivit...