2014
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyu039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in cross-cultural measurement in psychiatric epidemiology: utilizing 'what matters most' to identify culture-specific aspects of stigma

Abstract: Quantitatively-derived, culturally-specific stigma measures were lacking. Further, the vast majority of qualitative studies on stigma were conducted without using stigma-specific frameworks. We propose the 'what matters most' approach to address this key issue in future research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
111
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are at least two problems here: the need to adapt measures and their content to the local culture; and the issue of perceived legitimacy of discrimination. Regarding the adaptation of stigma measures we agree with the authors and the 'what matters most' approach (Yang et al 2014) that this adaptation is helpful. However there may be a downside, at least for quantitative studies, that findings will be more difficult to compare across settings, including the efficacy of anti-stigma interventions.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…There are at least two problems here: the need to adapt measures and their content to the local culture; and the issue of perceived legitimacy of discrimination. Regarding the adaptation of stigma measures we agree with the authors and the 'what matters most' approach (Yang et al 2014) that this adaptation is helpful. However there may be a downside, at least for quantitative studies, that findings will be more difficult to compare across settings, including the efficacy of anti-stigma interventions.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…Nevertheless, studies which include measures developed or validated in LAMICs and/or non-Western European cultures are still rare and only a few include a component focused on stigma which was developed specifically in a LAMIC country and/or non-Western European cultural setting (Thornicroft et al, in press). A recent systematic review (Yang et al 2014) assessed studies of stigma in non-Western European cultural groups and found that 77% identified studies assessed stigma using an adaptation of an existing measure which was developed in Western European countries. Moreover, only 2% studies used stigma measures which were derived within a non-Western European cultural group.…”
Section: Measurement Of Stigma and Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Indeed, in a recent systematic review, Yang et al found that the vast majority of studies analyzed (77%) utilized adaptations of existing Western-developed stigma measures. 13 Culture, stigma, and Latin America…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%