“…However, graphene generally tends to form irreversible agglomerates or even restack to form graphite through the π-π interactions and van der Waals force, and the easy aggregation of graphene during the processing could largely reduce its surface area and lessen the number of the electrochemically active sites Lin et al, 2013), which is not beneficial for sensing PCP by electrochemical method. In fact, for resolving the aggregation of graphene, various protective reagents, such as octadecylamine (Che et al, 2010), surfactants (Li et al, 2008), 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium ions (Acik et al, 2012) and DNA (Guo et al, 2010;Song et al, 2016), have been used for improving the dispersibility of graphene, whereas the presence of protective reagents may lead to the reduction of the effective surface area and conductivity, this will inevitably decrease the analytical performance of graphene Shi et al, 2014;Zhu et al, 2016). Most recently, a new method, novel carbon materials as "spacers" between graphene sheets has been developed to prevent the aggregation of graphene for lithium-sulfur batteries (Zhou et al, 2015a), capacitive deionization , catalytic , methanol oxidation (Zhu et al, 2014) and supercapacitor (Liu et al, 2015b), whereas little in electrochemical sensing.…”