2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2023.106720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in iron-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch to olefins reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peaks at 43.6 and 50.8° correspond to the (110) plane of Fe and the (200) plane of Co in their metallic forms, respectively. The strongest peak at 44.2° is assigned to the (510) plane of Fe 5 C 2 because the (200) plane of Co and (110) plane of Fe are significantly weaker than their monometallic counterparts. , This observation re-emphasized the robust Fe-carbon bonding in the Fe-containing samples, which not only resisted thermal sintering but also fostered robust metal–support interactions, thereby elevating the catalytic performance . In contrast, the monometallic Co nanofiber catalyst, lacking such effective Co-carbon interactions, became deactivated post 1050 °C calcination due to sintering (Figures K and B) …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Peaks at 43.6 and 50.8° correspond to the (110) plane of Fe and the (200) plane of Co in their metallic forms, respectively. The strongest peak at 44.2° is assigned to the (510) plane of Fe 5 C 2 because the (200) plane of Co and (110) plane of Fe are significantly weaker than their monometallic counterparts. , This observation re-emphasized the robust Fe-carbon bonding in the Fe-containing samples, which not only resisted thermal sintering but also fostered robust metal–support interactions, thereby elevating the catalytic performance . In contrast, the monometallic Co nanofiber catalyst, lacking such effective Co-carbon interactions, became deactivated post 1050 °C calcination due to sintering (Figures K and B) …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…62,63 This observation re-emphasized the robust Fe-carbon bonding in the Fe-containing samples, which not only resisted thermal sintering but also fostered robust metal−support interactions, thereby elevating the catalytic performance. 64 In contrast, the monometallic Co nanofiber catalyst, lacking such effective Co-carbon interactions, became deactivated post 1050 °C calcination due to sintering (Figures 1K and 5B). 65 The Raman spectra of the nanofiber catalysts subjected to various thermal treatments�450, 850, 1050, and 1250 °C� are presented in Figure 9.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…236–238 However, creating FTS catalyst for the production of an array of compounds with greater performance and selectivity still remains a formidable task for chemists, the use of iron-based catalyst can potentially offer a viable solution because such inexpensive, earth-abundant materials have displayed good performance and have capacity to produce various hydrocarbon compounds such as diesel, wax, gasoline to C 2 –C 4 olefins or paraffins. 239–243…”
Section: Catalytic Applications Of Nanosized Iron Oxidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SiO 2 mainly affects the dispersion of active components, adsorption and desorption of reactants and products, reduction, carbonization, mechanical strength, and textural properties of catalysts. In addition, a strong metal-support interaction (SMSI) can also change the reaction performance of the catalyst by affecting the acidity and alkalinity of the catalyst surface [7].…”
Section: Siomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gao et al [7] found that more and more studies have focused on the addition of promoters and the modification of supports in recent years. The introduction of promoters and the optimization of supports will achieve moderate hydrogenation, control C-C coupling, improve the selection of the catalyst target products (C 2 = ~C4 = ), and achieve the stability and durability of the reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%