2019
DOI: 10.5957/jst.2019.4.1.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Advances in Numerical and Experimental Downwind Sail Aerodynamics

Abstract: Over the past two decades, the numerical and experimental progresses made in the field of downwind sail aerodynamics have contributed to a new understanding of their behaviour and improved designs. Contemporary advances include the numerical and experimental evidence of the leading-edge vortex, as well as greater correlation between model and full-scale testing. Nevertheless, much remains to be understood on the aerodynamics of downwind sails and their flow structures. In this paper, a detailed review of the d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some conditions, the advection of these vortices near the sail surface results, in a time-averaged sense, in flow reattachment and in a closed recirculation region near the leading edge known as a leading-edge separation bubble (LESB) (Smith, Pisetta, & Viola, 2021). This is a feature akin to those experienced by thin aerofoils (Arena & Mueller, 1977; Carter & Vatsa, 1982; Chang, 1970; Owen & Klanfer, 1953), flat plates at small incidence (Crompton & Barrett, 2000; Gault, 1957; Newman & Tse, 1992; Stevenson, Walsh, & Nolan, 2016) and circular arcs at low incidence above the ideal angle of attack (Cyr, 1992; Souppez, Arredondo-Galeana, & Viola, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some conditions, the advection of these vortices near the sail surface results, in a time-averaged sense, in flow reattachment and in a closed recirculation region near the leading edge known as a leading-edge separation bubble (LESB) (Smith, Pisetta, & Viola, 2021). This is a feature akin to those experienced by thin aerofoils (Arena & Mueller, 1977; Carter & Vatsa, 1982; Chang, 1970; Owen & Klanfer, 1953), flat plates at small incidence (Crompton & Barrett, 2000; Gault, 1957; Newman & Tse, 1992; Stevenson, Walsh, & Nolan, 2016) and circular arcs at low incidence above the ideal angle of attack (Cyr, 1992; Souppez, Arredondo-Galeana, & Viola, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This is a geometry which is similar to the mid-height section of the scale model spinnakers. The experimental data were provided by Souppez et al (2019) and measured in the towing tank of Solent University at Re = 150 000. The experiments were designed to measure the blockage effect on a finite-aspect-ratio circular arc at angles of attack of 15 • and 20 • .…”
Section: Declaration Of Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the term sails encapsulates soft sails, but also rigid wings, whether using airfoil [21] or the increasingly popular circular arcs section [22,23,24,25]. From a fluid dynamics point of view, a significant distinction needs to be made between sails where the flow remains attached, and those experiencing separated flow.…”
Section: Sailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last two decades, numerical and experimental advances in the aerodynamics of sails have contributed to a new understanding of their behavioural patterns and improved design [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%