2017
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.10788.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in predicting gene–disease associations

Abstract: Deciphering gene–disease association is a crucial step in designing therapeutic strategies against diseases. There are experimental methods for identifying gene–disease associations, such as genome-wide association studies and linkage analysis, but these can be expensive and time consuming. As a result, various in silico methods for predicting associations from these and other data have been developed using different approaches. In this article, we review some of the recent approaches to the computational pred… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result various computational approaches have been developed to aid the discovery of such associations, such as knowledge-based methods (e.g., (Zhou and Skolnick 2016)) and methods based on text mining (e.g., (Kolker et al 2015)), crowdsourcing (e.g., (Loguercio et al 2013)) and networks (e.g., (Singh-Blom et al 2013;Zeng et al 2017)). Comprehensive surveys of these methods can be found in (Piro and Di Cunto 2012;Opap and Mulder 2017;Seyyedrazzagi and Navimipour 2017). Tremendous heterogeneity can be found in biological data -comprising measurements from diverse aspects of our complex biological systems -that are used to infer gene-disease associations.…”
Section: Case Study: Gene-disease Association Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result various computational approaches have been developed to aid the discovery of such associations, such as knowledge-based methods (e.g., (Zhou and Skolnick 2016)) and methods based on text mining (e.g., (Kolker et al 2015)), crowdsourcing (e.g., (Loguercio et al 2013)) and networks (e.g., (Singh-Blom et al 2013;Zeng et al 2017)). Comprehensive surveys of these methods can be found in (Piro and Di Cunto 2012;Opap and Mulder 2017;Seyyedrazzagi and Navimipour 2017). Tremendous heterogeneity can be found in biological data -comprising measurements from diverse aspects of our complex biological systems -that are used to infer gene-disease associations.…”
Section: Case Study: Gene-disease Association Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method applies the method of network analysis to predict the interaction between genes and diseases . The recent advances in predicting gene-disease associations have been reviewed by Opap and Mulder (2017). An understanding of the association between genetics and disease is an important step in understanding the etiology of diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, several computational approaches were developed to aid the prediction of novel DG candidates and prioritization of the most promising ones for experimental follow-up studies. Gene prioritization methods differ in the type and number of data sources used (such as biomedical literature, gene expression data, functional annotations, and interaction networks), the prior knowledge about the DGs, the data representation, or the prediction/prioritization functions, however, the majority uses the guilty-by-association principle identifying and prioritizing candidate genes based on their topological or functional similarity (correlated expression profiles, protein interactions or participation in the same biological processes) to known DGs [31] [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%