2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in process and catalyst for CO2 reforming of methane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CH 4 and CO 2 conversions monotonically increase as a function of reaction temperature for all the catalysts, these are agreed well with the endothermic nature of the dry reforming of methane reaction (Equation ( 1)). The CH 4 conversion is lower compared to the CO 2 conversion, which is due to the simultaneous occurrence of a reverse water gas shift reaction (Equation ( 2)) [10,11,20]…”
Section: H2-tpr and H2-tpd Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CH 4 and CO 2 conversions monotonically increase as a function of reaction temperature for all the catalysts, these are agreed well with the endothermic nature of the dry reforming of methane reaction (Equation ( 1)). The CH 4 conversion is lower compared to the CO 2 conversion, which is due to the simultaneous occurrence of a reverse water gas shift reaction (Equation ( 2)) [10,11,20]…”
Section: H2-tpr and H2-tpd Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an abundant alternative to petroleum and coal, natural gas and biogas that are rich in CH 4 have become the main energy resources [5][6][7][8]. Therefore, the dry reforming of methane (Equation (1)), which can simultaneously utilize methane and carbon dioxide, is significant to alleviate the energy crisis and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions [9][10][11]. Compared with the partial oxidation and steam reforming of methane, dry reforming of methane is industrially advantageous due to the syngas with a low H 2 /CO molar ratio of nearly 1, which is more appropriate for the synthesis of hydrocarbons with long-chain through the Fischer-Tropsch reaction [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Carbon coking may not only cause the catalyst deactivation by blocking active sites, but also fracture catalyst granules or cause a high‐pressure drop in the reactor [8] . The agglomeration and sintering of the metal nanoparticles at the surface of support remains another challenge leading to catalytic performance degradation during the DRM reaction [7] . In this case, the growth of nanoparticles on supports due to the weak metal–oxide interactions would lead to the reducing of active sites and hence the performance degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] The agglomeration and sintering of the metal nanoparticles at the surface of support remains another challenge leading to catalytic performance degradation during the DRM reaction. [7] In this case,t he growth of nanoparticles on supports due to the weak metal-oxide interactions would lead to the reducing of active sites and hence the performance degradation. Therefore,itisakey challenge to develop highly active and stable catalysts with high resistance to thermal sintering and coking for dry reforming of CH 4 /CO 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%