2021
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202004577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Advances in Silicon‐Based Electrodes: From Fundamental Research toward Practical Applications

Abstract: Figure 2. Illustration of the crystal structures of the main cathode materials: a) LiFePO 4 with olivine structure, b) LiMn 2 O 4 with spinel structure, and c) LiNi 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 O 2 with layered structure. d) Comparison of energy density for typical cathode materials. a,b,d) Reproduced with permission. [55]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
223
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(251 citation statements)
references
References 385 publications
(459 reference statements)
1
223
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 26 , 27 ] Thus, the application of the Li‐ion concept through the replacement of the metallic lithium with a stable and non‐reactive anode based on lithium intercalation, [28] conversion, [29] or alloying [30] may actually represent an attractive compromise to safely exploit the multi‐electron conversion process of the Li−S battery. [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ] In particular, Li‐alloys with Sn[ 37 , 38 ] and Si [39] or their oxides[ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ] exploiting the nanostructured morphology have revealed higher capacity compared to graphite (372 mAh g −1 ), with values ranging from 500 to 1000 mAh g −1 , due to the multiple lithium‐ion exchange per molar unit of metal. Another raising point has been represented by the sustainability of the new energy storage devices, which focused the attention on the necessity of eco‐friendly materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 26 , 27 ] Thus, the application of the Li‐ion concept through the replacement of the metallic lithium with a stable and non‐reactive anode based on lithium intercalation, [28] conversion, [29] or alloying [30] may actually represent an attractive compromise to safely exploit the multi‐electron conversion process of the Li−S battery. [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ] In particular, Li‐alloys with Sn[ 37 , 38 ] and Si [39] or their oxides[ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ] exploiting the nanostructured morphology have revealed higher capacity compared to graphite (372 mAh g −1 ), with values ranging from 500 to 1000 mAh g −1 , due to the multiple lithium‐ion exchange per molar unit of metal. Another raising point has been represented by the sustainability of the new energy storage devices, which focused the attention on the necessity of eco‐friendly materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though nanostructured strategy could solve the solid-state diffusion issue in thick electrodes, the deteriorated wettability of the electrode with the electrolyte, the increased ion transfer distance, and the limited charge transport kinetics induce the considerable polarization and inferior rate performance, especially at high charging/discharging current densities. [36,37] Thus, a high Li-ion diffusivity in the electrolyte is also necessary. The effective ionic diffusion coefficient D eff in electrolytes can be defined as [38] eff…”
Section: Basic Consideration On Batteries Electrode Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1–3 ] For that, batteries based on Si anode offers us with tremendous opportunities for its high theoretical capacity, suitable electrochemical potential, and low cost. [ 4,5 ] However, it suffers from great volume changes (>300%) upon lithiation/delithiation based on the alloying/dealloying mechanism, exposing Si particles to mechanical fatigue that results in the electrode pulverization and instability of solid‐electrolyte interphase (SEI). [ 6,7 ] As is often the case, Si anode experiences dramatic capacity decay with low Coulombic efficiency (CE), which presents a great barrier for the commercialization of Si‐based lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%