2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2017.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in smart integrated membrane assisted liquid extraction technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 summarizes previous works focused on the zinc recovery from SPAs at laboratory scale using SX and membrane-based solvent extraction (MBSX), including the innovative NDSX and emulsion pertraction (EPT) configurations, which are performed in hollow fiber membrane contactors (HFMC) [32]. HFMCs permit the non-dispersive extraction of metals by using the porous membrane to stabilize the aqueous-organic interface [44][45][46][47]. EPT and NDSX differ in the way of contacting the fluid phases and the number of contactors [48].…”
Section: Znmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 2 summarizes previous works focused on the zinc recovery from SPAs at laboratory scale using SX and membrane-based solvent extraction (MBSX), including the innovative NDSX and emulsion pertraction (EPT) configurations, which are performed in hollow fiber membrane contactors (HFMC) [32]. HFMCs permit the non-dispersive extraction of metals by using the porous membrane to stabilize the aqueous-organic interface [44][45][46][47]. EPT and NDSX differ in the way of contacting the fluid phases and the number of contactors [48].…”
Section: Znmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HFMCs permit the non-dispersive extraction of metals by using the porous membrane to stabilize the aqueous–organic interface [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]. EPT and NDSX differ in the way of contacting the fluid phases and the number of contactors [ 48 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liquid layer between the immobilized interfaces acts as a selective barrier which is responsible for solute transport. This technique has its own limitations due to low inventory of the membrane phase (in case planned for large concentration of solute), and issues related to membrane instability [7,9,[11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not as efficient as hollow-fiber membrane modules, FS-SLM modules are simple to fabricate and can be designed to meet separation requirements. The efficacy of both hollow-fiber and flat sheet SLM geometries has been demonstrated for large, i.e., tens of milliliters or more, volume radionuclide separations in papers by Danesi et al, Chaudry et al, Shukla et al, and others as described in the comprehensive reviews by de Gyves et al and Pabby et al ,, However, flow-through microfluidic SLM modules have primarily been demonstrated for use in small-volume separations of organic molecules or stable metal ions in biological and environmental samples and never, to the best of our knowledge, for the separation of radionuclides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%