2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-017-1763-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in solid polymer electrolytes for lithium batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
332
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 444 publications
(347 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
2
332
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Solid‐state batteries constructed from solid electrolytes (SEs) attract ever growing attentions, because SEs offer high safety, and their excellent stability enables metallic Li anode and high‐voltage cathode, which results in high energy density . SEs for lithium batteries mainly fall into two categories of materials: ionic conducting ceramics and polymers . However, SEs usually suffer from low ionic conductivity and huge resistances at the interfaces between SE and active electrodes .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solid‐state batteries constructed from solid electrolytes (SEs) attract ever growing attentions, because SEs offer high safety, and their excellent stability enables metallic Li anode and high‐voltage cathode, which results in high energy density . SEs for lithium batteries mainly fall into two categories of materials: ionic conducting ceramics and polymers . However, SEs usually suffer from low ionic conductivity and huge resistances at the interfaces between SE and active electrodes .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SEs usually suffer from low ionic conductivity and huge resistances at the interfaces between SE and active electrodes . The ionic conductivities of polymers are below 10 −6 S cm −1 and their stabilities under high potentials is poor, even though they show low resistances at the electrode/electrolyte interfaces . Inorganic ceramics own high ionic conductivities of 10 −4 –10 −2 S cm −1 , but the interfacial resistances between rigid oxides and electrodes are huge, and sulfides are apt to release poisonous H 2 S and contain very expensive components .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from the active fillers, the price and self‐synthesis process for inert fillers are relatively low and simple. Meanwhile, there is an interaction of Lewis acid–base pair between the nanoparticles and anion group of lithium salt, such as ClO 4 − and TFSI − , which is beneficial for dissolving lithium salt and releases more Li + . In addition, the nanoparticles can provide some path on their surface for ion transfer and distort highly ordered polymer segments to increase the content of amorphous phase, which provides the possibility of increasing conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, efforts are needed to optimize the performance of SIC ‐BCEs both in fundamental studies and materials design. According to various recent reviews and from our own knowledge of BCEs, we may tentatively suggest the SIC ‐BCE structure shown in Fig. , with (a) short PEO side chains for high mobility, (b) super‐delocalized sulfonylimide anions for improving ionic conductivity at room temperature, (c) low T g flexible backbone for promoting chain motion, (d) flexible spacer, (e) hydrophobic block for imparting mechanical strength and inducing self‐assembly and (f) crosslinked sites to allow for post‐crosslinking after self‐assembly of block copolymers and the possibility of adding plasticizer while preserving self‐standing character and hence increasing ionic conductivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%