2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in the characterization of HIV-1 neutralization assays for standardized evaluation of the antibody response to infection and vaccination

Abstract: In AIDS vaccine development the pendulum has swung towards a renewed emphasis on the potential role for neutralizing antibodies in a successful global vaccine. It is recognized that vaccine-induced antibody performance, as assessed in the available neutralization assays, may well serve as a "gatekeeper" for HIV-1 subunit vaccine prioritization and advancement. As a result, development of a standardized platform for reproducible measurement of neutralizing antibodies has received considerable attention. Here we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
107
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, it has been proposed that neutralization might ultimately require secondary processes such as NAb crosslinking, prevention of adsorption, or gp120 shedding (7)(8)(9)(10). A central cause for uncertainty occurs because the infectivity assays required to identify and analyze neutralization have been poorly understood and give discrepant results using identical HIV-1s and NAbs (11)(12)(13). Consequently, it has become evident that elucidation of NMAb mechanisms requires improved understanding of the factors that influence infectivity assays (11)(12)(13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, it has been proposed that neutralization might ultimately require secondary processes such as NAb crosslinking, prevention of adsorption, or gp120 shedding (7)(8)(9)(10). A central cause for uncertainty occurs because the infectivity assays required to identify and analyze neutralization have been poorly understood and give discrepant results using identical HIV-1s and NAbs (11)(12)(13). Consequently, it has become evident that elucidation of NMAb mechanisms requires improved understanding of the factors that influence infectivity assays (11)(12)(13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely used neutralization assay, which has been recommended as a worldwide standard (13) and detects NAbs that contribute to host-virus coevolution in vivo (3,20), uses TZM-bl(JC.53) cells that were derived from our HeLa-CD4/ CCR5 cell clone JC.53 (21) by transfection with LTR-luciferase and LTR-β-galactosidase reporter plasmids (22). These reporters provide a facile means to monitor infections but have no effect on efficiencies of infection by diverse HIV-1 isolates or sensitivities to NAbs (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pseudovirus Neutralization Competition Assay-TZM/bl cells were used to determine HIV-1 neutralization by 2F5 and 4E10 mAbs (45,46). The mAb was titered in 3-fold serial dilutions starting at 50 g/ml in the growth medium (DMEM with 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 g/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine (Quality Biologics Inc.), and 15% fetal calf serum (Gemini Bio-Products)).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IC 50 was calculated for each mAb alone and mAb pre-mixed with gp41 recombinant proteins or other control competitors. Two independent assays were performed, and the results were averaged (45,46).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation