2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2011.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in the measurement of strongly radiating, turbulent reacting flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
(227 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, none report the important Stokes number (Sk 0 ) range of order unity, in which the particle response time is the same order of magnitude as the fluid time scale, but are instead limited to the range of Sk 0 > 9, in which particles exhibit a relatively weak response to turbulent motions. The Stokes number regime of order unity is also particularly relevant in the study of industrial burners as common flow conditions within these burners, shown in table 2, typically result in a Stokes number of order unity (Mullinger & Jenkins 2008;Nathan et al 2012;Smoot & Smith 1985). Furthermore, out of all the previous experiments, only Mostafa et al (1989) employ a truly mono-disperse particle distribution (using a standard deviation in particle size distribution of less than 5%), although Hardalupas et al (1989) and Fleckhaus et al (1987) employ particles with a standard deviation of particle size distribution of less than 15%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of these, none report the important Stokes number (Sk 0 ) range of order unity, in which the particle response time is the same order of magnitude as the fluid time scale, but are instead limited to the range of Sk 0 > 9, in which particles exhibit a relatively weak response to turbulent motions. The Stokes number regime of order unity is also particularly relevant in the study of industrial burners as common flow conditions within these burners, shown in table 2, typically result in a Stokes number of order unity (Mullinger & Jenkins 2008;Nathan et al 2012;Smoot & Smith 1985). Furthermore, out of all the previous experiments, only Mostafa et al (1989) employ a truly mono-disperse particle distribution (using a standard deviation in particle size distribution of less than 5%), although Hardalupas et al (1989) and Fleckhaus et al (1987) employ particles with a standard deviation of particle size distribution of less than 15%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, it aims to provide new insight into the role of the Stokes number on the velocity and concentration distributions within a turbulent jet under the three Table 2. Typical conditions found within industrial direct-fired pulverised coal burners (Mullinger & Jenkins 2008;Nathan et al 2012;Smoot & Smith 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-dimensional (3D) measurements have been long desired for the study of many thermal-fluid topics to resolve the 3D spatial structures inherent in turbulent flows [1,2]. Furthermore, instantaneous measurements with proper temporal resolution are of particular importance due to the dynamic and transient nature of turbulent flows [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, instantaneous measurements with proper temporal resolution are of particular importance due to the dynamic and transient nature of turbulent flows [1,2]. Possible options that can potentially meet both the spatial and temporal requirements seem to be very limited and most of the existing efforts can be broadly divided into two categories [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding, designing and optimizing flows is crucial, e.g., for improving fuel injections [1], combustions [2,3], fuel cells [4], wind turbines [5], turbomachines [6], human air and blood flows in medicine [7,8], as well as for the fundamental task of modeling flow turbulence [9]. For this purpose, optical measurement methods are essential tools that promise fast and precise field measurements of complex flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%