2017
DOI: 10.1117/12.2245720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in the modelling of the thermal conductance of uncooled microbolometers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, the strut only consists of (i) a low-stress oxide or nitride film acting as the support for the detector structure and (ii) a conductor to electrically contact the thermally sensitive material as shown in Figure . For recently demonstrated microbolometers, the struts commonly have thicknesses on the order of 100s of nm, widths on the order of 1s of μm, and lengths in the 10s of μm, resulting in ∼10 –6 to 10 –8 [W·K –1 ] strut conductances. Other than improved fabrication techniques and design, there is little that can be done to reduce the thermal conductance of the strut other than reducing the mechanical stress via reduction in the mass of the suspended detector. This reduction, from integrating a nanophotonic absorber for instance, would allow for the struts to be thinner and longer and thus reducing the thermal conductance and improving the specific detectivity.…”
Section: Simple Thermodynamic Model For Thermal Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, the strut only consists of (i) a low-stress oxide or nitride film acting as the support for the detector structure and (ii) a conductor to electrically contact the thermally sensitive material as shown in Figure . For recently demonstrated microbolometers, the struts commonly have thicknesses on the order of 100s of nm, widths on the order of 1s of μm, and lengths in the 10s of μm, resulting in ∼10 –6 to 10 –8 [W·K –1 ] strut conductances. Other than improved fabrication techniques and design, there is little that can be done to reduce the thermal conductance of the strut other than reducing the mechanical stress via reduction in the mass of the suspended detector. This reduction, from integrating a nanophotonic absorber for instance, would allow for the struts to be thinner and longer and thus reducing the thermal conductance and improving the specific detectivity.…”
Section: Simple Thermodynamic Model For Thermal Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%