2020
DOI: 10.1002/ppp.2061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in the study of Arctic submarine permafrost

Abstract: Submarine permafrost is perennially cryotic earth material that lies offshore. Most submarine permafrost is relict terrestrial permafrost beneath the Arctic shelf seas, was inundated after the last glaciation, and has been warming and thawing ever since. As a reservoir and confining layer for gas hydrates, it has the potential to release greenhouse gasses and impact coastal infrastructure, but its distribution and rate of thaw are poorly constrained by observational data. Lengthening summers, reduced sea ice e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This compares reasonably well to bottom-up estimates based on extrapolations of flux measurements [111,117,158], but the continuous formation and drainage of thermokarst lakes in permafrost landscapes make it challenging to model emissions prognostically [159]. For the Arctic Ocean, detailed models exist that can simulate the evolution of gas hydrates and their emission to the atmosphere (e.g., [160]) but due to the slow thaw of subsea permafrost, which has been ongoing since these environments were submerged at the end of the last glacial, gas hydrates are not expected to destabilize until the next millennium [161]. Bottom-up estimates of geological emissions from the terrestrial Arctic are relatively small,~2 TgC year −1 [162], but these emissions may respond to changes in permafrost thickness and disappearance of glaciers and ice caps.…”
Section: Bottom-up Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This compares reasonably well to bottom-up estimates based on extrapolations of flux measurements [111,117,158], but the continuous formation and drainage of thermokarst lakes in permafrost landscapes make it challenging to model emissions prognostically [159]. For the Arctic Ocean, detailed models exist that can simulate the evolution of gas hydrates and their emission to the atmosphere (e.g., [160]) but due to the slow thaw of subsea permafrost, which has been ongoing since these environments were submerged at the end of the last glacial, gas hydrates are not expected to destabilize until the next millennium [161]. Bottom-up estimates of geological emissions from the terrestrial Arctic are relatively small,~2 TgC year −1 [162], but these emissions may respond to changes in permafrost thickness and disappearance of glaciers and ice caps.…”
Section: Bottom-up Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the reviewed articles dedicated their research to subsea-permafrost. While several studies focused their research to sea surface properties (e.g., [151,[217][218][219]255,258,410]), submarine permafrost itself is largely invisible to satellite remote sensing which explains the lack of studies in this field of research [483].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any released gas might not reach the atmosphere, as it has to bypass numerous sinks, including anaerobic oxidation in the sediment column (Overduin et al, 2015), dissolution in the pore water and surface water, lowpermeability layers, and lagoon ice. Angelopoulos et al (2020b) provide a review of subsea permafrost within the context of global climate change, and Ruppel and Kessler (2017) provide a review specific to climate change interactions with gas hydrates.…”
Section: Impact Of Marine Inundationmentioning
confidence: 99%