Recent Advances in Underwater Archaeology

Lenihan, Daniel J.

doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4145-5_6

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Bone Preservation1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2008

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Bone decays in specifi c ways when exposed to water for extended periods of time. Changes in the form and substance of bone occur under these conditions (Lenihan 2000). Bone loses the greater part of its mechanical strength with the loss of collagen and other constituents.…”

Section: Bone Preservationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Endurance in the Canyon: Assessing preservation at a multi-component site on the Southern High Plains, USA

Backhouse

Backhouse²,

Johnson

et al. 2008

Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Bone Preservationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Endurance in the Canyon: Assessing preservation at a multi-component site on the Southern High Plains, USA

Backhouse

Backhouse²,

Johnson

et al. 2008

Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“The early days” – underwater prehistoric archaeology in the USA and Canada

Garrison

Hale²

2020

The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maritime Claims and Underwater Archaeology: When History Meets Politics

Aznar

2021

BRP Law Sea

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Among other circumstances relevant to maritime delimitations, some States have recently used the protection of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) as grounds for advancing jurisdictional or sovereignty claims over different maritime areas. After identifying the contours of current international law governing that heritage, this book critically addresses: first, the generally limited use of archaeological heritage in territorial claims; second, the broad acceptance by States of ‘archaeological maritime zones’ that overlap with declared contiguous zones; and, third, the (mis)use of UCH and underwater archaeology in three still disputed maritime claims, namely, Canada’s claim in Arctic waters, China’s in the South China Sea, and Russia’s in Crimea and its surrounding waters. Legal and ethical issues related to underwater archaeology are also discussed.

show abstract

Recent Advances in Underwater Archaeology

Cited by 3 publications

References 8 publications

Endurance in the Canyon: Assessing preservation at a multi-component site on the Southern High Plains, USA

Endurance in the Canyon: Assessing preservation at a multi-component site on the Southern High Plains, USA

“The early days” – underwater prehistoric archaeology in the USA and Canada

Maritime Claims and Underwater Archaeology: When History Meets Politics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About