“…Notably, surface chemistry and material characteristics as well as hydrophobicity, strongly influence the composition of the adsorbed molecules and the consequent cellular cascade of FBR [ 7 ], thus underlining the importance of the surrounding biomaterial coating around typical Polyimide (PI)-based implants that could impact the biocompatibility and safety of the implanted interface [ 3 , 4 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. In this regard, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) [ 11 , 12 , 13 ] and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA) [ 14 , 15 ], which have long been the most common coatings used to overcome the undesired FBR to PI-based implantable interfaces, were recently replaced by the more stable poly(carboxybetaines), poly(phosphobetaines) and poly(sulfobetaines) zwitterionic hydrogels [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. These hydrogels present advantageous features in terms of hydrophilicity, biocompatibility and anti-inflammatory and ultra-low fouling characteristics, both in vitro and in vivo [ 20 , 21 , 22 ].…”