1974
DOI: 10.1029/ar021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Antarctic and Subantarctic Brachiopods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
145
3

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
145
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Externally N. reevei is close to the Antarctic species N. lecointei (Joubin, 1901), which also has a finely pustulose surface (Foster, 1974). It differs, however, in being much smaller and having more distinct, elevated anterior adductor scars.…”
Section: Novocrania Reeveimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Externally N. reevei is close to the Antarctic species N. lecointei (Joubin, 1901), which also has a finely pustulose surface (Foster, 1974). It differs, however, in being much smaller and having more distinct, elevated anterior adductor scars.…”
Section: Novocrania Reeveimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foster (1974) synonymised C. patagonica Dall, 1902, C. joubini Thomson, 1918and C. antarcticaensis Hatai, 1965 with C. lecointei; commented on its morphological variability, and noted it was the only craniid species present in Antarctic and South American waters. Lee (1987) and Lee et al (1997) listed Late Eocene -Early Oligocene fossil specimens from the North Otago and juvenile specimens from the Chatham Island Pliocene locality at Moutapu Point under the name Neocrania chathamensis (Allan, 1937).…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…vulvaria is certainly the most unusual among the patterns described here, as it is quite different from both the above-mentioned fossil material and recent taxa. In effect, the distribution of the punctae was studied in some detail in recent terebratulides, and it has been shown that in all studied species the pattern of the spatial positioning of the punctae was similar, consisting of more or less uniformly sized punctae disposed without significant changes in density (Foster 1974: fig. 3).…”
Section: Distribution Of Punctae 2 As a Systematic Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%