2016
DOI: 10.1116/1.4946046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent applications of hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Abstract: Recent applications of hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HAXPES) demonstrate its many capabilities in addition to several of its limitations. Examples are given, including measurement of buried interfaces and materials under in-situ or in-operando conditions, as well as measurements under x-ray standing-wave and resonant excitation. Physical considerations that differentiate HAXPES from photoemission measurements utilizing soft and ultraviolet x rays are also presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
(186 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Λ e is the inelastic mean free path determined through the Tanuma–Powell–Penn algorithm 53 , since the single scattering albedo is negligible for excitation energies above 2.0 keV 54 55 ; Λ e (for an incoming photon energy of 4.0 keV and a 1.0 M pyrazine aqueous solution as attenuating medium) is equal to 8.8 nm and to 9.3 nm for an N 1 s (BE=400.6 eV) and an O 1 s (BE=532.8 eV) escaping photoelectron, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Λ e is the inelastic mean free path determined through the Tanuma–Powell–Penn algorithm 53 , since the single scattering albedo is negligible for excitation energies above 2.0 keV 54 55 ; Λ e (for an incoming photon energy of 4.0 keV and a 1.0 M pyrazine aqueous solution as attenuating medium) is equal to 8.8 nm and to 9.3 nm for an N 1 s (BE=400.6 eV) and an O 1 s (BE=532.8 eV) escaping photoelectron, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recoil is present in all photoemission processes and the corresponding loss of photoelectron kinetic energy (ΔE K ) is given by ΔE K = E K (m e /M), where E K is the photoelectron kinetic energy, m e is the electron rest mass, and M the emitting atom mass (49). Therefore, recoil effects are not negligible for high photoelectron kinetic energy and light elements (49,57) and the energy difference observed here is a consequence of the larger photon energy used in the present work (4 keV) compared to typically used soft X-rays (< 2 keV). A detailed analysis of the VB photoemission spectra from the biphasic coating is reported in Figure 2d for the cases of measurement under pristine, hydrated, and electrochemical conditions.…”
Section: Operando Spectroscopic Investigation Of the Biphasic Coo X Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To perform a detailed surface and near-surface spectroscopic investigation, we have used ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (APXPS) coupled with intermediate energy, or "tender", X-rays (hν = 4.0 keV). Taking advantage of the high photoelectron kinetic energy (49,50) it is possible to probe 10 -30 nm of a liquid phase and 2 -10 nm of a solid phase, while simultaneously undergoing electrochemical reactions (39, 42-44, 46, 48).Previously, we observed a significant improvement of OER electrocatalytic activity in a biphasic CoO x system, in which a disordered outer-surface layer of Co(OH) 2 is introduced atop a nanocrystalline spinel Co 3 O 4 phase via PE-ALD, relative to pure phase spinel Co 3 O 4 (37). However, the electrochemical and ex situ spectroscopic measurements utilized in that study were incapable of characterizing the extent of conversion from Co(OH) 2 to CoO(OH), the degree to which spinel Co 3 O 4 may undergo parallel chemical transformations, the composition of the film under real operational conditions, or the validity of the current mechanistic models for OER on CoO x formed via PE-ALD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be due to recoil effects when momentum is transferred from the ejected photoelectron to the emitting atom. Recoil is present in all photoemission processes and its effects are non-negligible for high photoelectron KEs and light elements [51,52]. At a photon energy of 4000 eV the calibration performed on gold using the Au 4f 7/2 core level signal (KE~3916 eV) is essentially not influenced by the recoil (the corresponding loss is about 10 meV).…”
Section: Evolution Of the Physical/chemical Properties Of The Solid/lmentioning
confidence: 99%