2020
DOI: 10.1186/s40657-020-00209-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent changes in breeding abundance and distribution of the Common Pochard (Aythya ferina) in its eastern range

Abstract: Background The Common Pochard (Aythya ferina) (hereafter Pochard), a widespread and common freshwater diving duck in the Palearctic, was reclassified in 2015 from Least Concern to Vulnerable IUCN status based on rapid declines throughout its range. Analysis of its status, distribution and the potential causes for the decline in Europe has been undertaken, but there has never been a review of its status in the major part of its breeding range across Russia to the Pacific coast. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, according to the IUCN [37], the species' decrease is mainly due to the loss of its breeding habitat in Eastern Europe. In Central Europe, it appears that the major factors responsible for its decline are nest predation [37,45] by natural (Vulpes vulpes and Sus e average (mean) of the species' annual numbers counted in a site (their sum is divided by the number of years the site was censused). 2 Maximum wintering number observed in a site since its first year of census.…”
Section: Population Size and Trendmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, according to the IUCN [37], the species' decrease is mainly due to the loss of its breeding habitat in Eastern Europe. In Central Europe, it appears that the major factors responsible for its decline are nest predation [37,45] by natural (Vulpes vulpes and Sus e average (mean) of the species' annual numbers counted in a site (their sum is divided by the number of years the site was censused). 2 Maximum wintering number observed in a site since its first year of census.…”
Section: Population Size and Trendmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…acid precipitation, climate change) and local (e.g. eutrophication, invasive alien species) effects (Bradshaw et al., 2009 ; de Wit et al., 2016 ; Holopainen et al., 2021 ; Holopainen & Lehikoinen, 2022 ; Mischenko et al., 2020 ; Schindler, 1998 ; Weyhenmeyer et al., 2014 ). Anthropogenic pressures can have strong impacts on the biodiversity of wetlands, influencing all trophic levels from primary producers to higher level consumers (Christensen et al., 2006 ; Nilsson, 1978 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The richness and abundance of waterbirds are influenced by the wetland characteristics, for example, depth variability, water quality, phyto and zooplankton, vegetation around the banks, invasive plants, area, water level fluctuation, and surrounding landscapes composition (Ma et al, 2010;Russel et al, 2014, Brandolin andBlendinger, 2016;Mischenko et al, 2020;Basaula et al, 2021). In addition, the seasonal food availability, temperature, and climate change also affect the population dynamics and arrival-departure dates of the waterbirds (Anguita and Simeone 2015;Donnelly et al, 2016;Park et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%