2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-008-0412-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent developments in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer patients

Abstract: This invited review deals with the latest knowledge regarding breast conserving therapy in breast conserving patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 209 publications
(141 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of prospective and retrospective analyses suggest that there is no benefit for resection-free margins of >2 mm compared with <2 mm; [27] thus, there is only little evidence that oncoplastic surgery may in fact improve oncologic results. However, the possibility of increased resection volume plays a central role in raising the rate of BCT [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of prospective and retrospective analyses suggest that there is no benefit for resection-free margins of >2 mm compared with <2 mm; [27] thus, there is only little evidence that oncoplastic surgery may in fact improve oncologic results. However, the possibility of increased resection volume plays a central role in raising the rate of BCT [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the lower quadrant, the defect is easily visible compared to the other side. However, in the upper lateral quadrant, the gravity of the breast parenchyma may stretch the skin over the defect and may improve cosmoses without using a local oncoplastic technique [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, the number of patients with residual disease at or near the cut edge of their primary surgical specimen ranges from 5 to 82%, with the majority of studies indicating positive margins in 20-40% of patients. 2 This high variability indicates that surgical margin assessment lacks standardization, despite its importance to a patient's long-term prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Чистота краев резекции -главный показатель адекватности органосохраняющей операции [4,[9][10][11][12][13]. Один из главных факторов развития местного рецидива после органосох-раняющих операций у больных РМЖ является состояние краев резекции [9,10,14,16,17]. Стандартной является хирургическая практика добиваться чистых краев резекции путем повторного иссечения [3,15].…”
unclassified