2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.05.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent developments in capillary isoelectric focusing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although all the separation modes, including one or two multidimensional RPLC and/or CE, have been widely used for complex samples analysis [12][13][14][15][16], CIEF, which shows excellent concentration capacity, high resolution and high sensitivity, has drawn much attention especially for the separation of proteins [17][18][19][20]. In contrast, RPLC has advantages of high efficiency and high resolution, and more importantly, the mobile phase is compatible with MS, demonstrating preferable attributes for peptide separation [21][22][23].…”
Section: Tingting Wangmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although all the separation modes, including one or two multidimensional RPLC and/or CE, have been widely used for complex samples analysis [12][13][14][15][16], CIEF, which shows excellent concentration capacity, high resolution and high sensitivity, has drawn much attention especially for the separation of proteins [17][18][19][20]. In contrast, RPLC has advantages of high efficiency and high resolution, and more importantly, the mobile phase is compatible with MS, demonstrating preferable attributes for peptide separation [21][22][23].…”
Section: Tingting Wangmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although hundreds of papers have appeared, it is clear that this versatile technique for analysing amphoteric compounds has not reached that high utilisation like other capillary electrophoretic methods. Several reviews have been published on the use of this high-performance separation method [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to these advantages of cIEF-MS, the major problems in hyphenation are the presence of ampholytes (signal suppression in MS) and the zone broadening from cIEF to MS. Tang et al [2,4] showed that for cIEF-ESI-MS, ampholytes concentrations of more than 0.5% give significant signal suppression and considerably impair sensitivity. However, the number of cIEF-MALDI papers is by far outnumbered by the amount of papers on the coupling of cIEF to ESI (recently reviewed in [5][6][7]). Probably the on-line analysis and higher sampling rate are the reasons for the popularity of ESI over MALDI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%