2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2006.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent developments in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
11

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
68
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…It is widely recognized that wraparound can be a problem when analyzing matrix-rich environmental samples because peaks of coeluted Fig. 1 Two-dimension gas chromatography (GC×GC)-micro electron capture detection (μECD) chromatograms of a technical C 10 -C 13 shortchain chlorinated paraffin (SCCP) mixture with a 55 % (w/w) chlorine content using three different column combinations: a DM-1 column followed by a BPX-70 column (a), a DM-1 column followed by a BPX-50 column (b), and a DM-1 column followed by a DB-WAX column (c) interfering compounds from the matrix can overlap with the target compound peaks and affect the ability to quantify the target compounds [26]. In other words, a modulation period must be chosen that preserves the first-dimension separation, which requires the peaks corresponding to all compounds eluted from the first GC column to be as sharp as possible.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Modulation Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely recognized that wraparound can be a problem when analyzing matrix-rich environmental samples because peaks of coeluted Fig. 1 Two-dimension gas chromatography (GC×GC)-micro electron capture detection (μECD) chromatograms of a technical C 10 -C 13 shortchain chlorinated paraffin (SCCP) mixture with a 55 % (w/w) chlorine content using three different column combinations: a DM-1 column followed by a BPX-70 column (a), a DM-1 column followed by a BPX-50 column (b), and a DM-1 column followed by a DB-WAX column (c) interfering compounds from the matrix can overlap with the target compound peaks and affect the ability to quantify the target compounds [26]. In other words, a modulation period must be chosen that preserves the first-dimension separation, which requires the peaks corresponding to all compounds eluted from the first GC column to be as sharp as possible.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Modulation Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this, calibration and quantification of GCÂGC peak responses are performed with the same approaches as for GC (including internal calibration, external calibration, and response factors), but research surveys document that the quantitative performance of GCÂGC is superior to that for one-dimensional GC [48][49][50]. In an early report of quantitative performance for GCÂGC, Gaines et al [51] reported two-to fourfold improvements in limits-ofdetection for trace oxygenate and aromatic compounds with FID.…”
Section: Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of GC×GC to the analysis of highly complex petrochemical mixtures has been described by a number of authors [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. However, despite the increase in separation power, peak co-elution still occurs when samples containing isomeric compounds are 3 analysed by comprehensive two dimensional GC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%