2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01484.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent developments in effector biology of filamentous plant pathogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1, bottom) might be proposed as a signature of bioactivity for the PcF Toxin Family. 8,22 As confirmed by direct mutagenesis, the Glu25 residue included in the signature, present in both PcF and SCR91 sub-family members, supports stronger bioactivity in our bioassays as compared to SCR74, where it is replaced by a disulfide-forming Cys residue. PcF's orthologs from both P. sojae and P. ramorum appear to share most part of this signature (not shown) but do not exhibit the RXLR motif required for oomycete proteins translocation inside host plant cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, bottom) might be proposed as a signature of bioactivity for the PcF Toxin Family. 8,22 As confirmed by direct mutagenesis, the Glu25 residue included in the signature, present in both PcF and SCR91 sub-family members, supports stronger bioactivity in our bioassays as compared to SCR74, where it is replaced by a disulfide-forming Cys residue. PcF's orthologs from both P. sojae and P. ramorum appear to share most part of this signature (not shown) but do not exhibit the RXLR motif required for oomycete proteins translocation inside host plant cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…These include the RXLR motif that is required for translocation of secreted oomycete effectors inside the host cell cytoplasm, and appears to identify those effectors directed to host intracellular targets. 2,5,7,8,10,12 As a result, the oomycete effectors are currently grouped under different classes based on their modulatory activity toward plant defense and immunity. 6 Furthermore, the oomycete effector secretome comprises several uncharacterized proteins resulting from large-scale comparative genomics efforts aimed at elucidating the molecular mechanisms of Phytophthora pathogenicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In susceptible plants, these effectors promote infection by suppressing defense responses, enhancing susceptibility, or inducing disease symptoms. Alternatively, in resistant plants, effectors are recognized by the products of plant resistance genes, resulting in host cell death and effective defense responses known as the hypersensitive response (HR) (de Wit 2007;Kamoun 2007;Oliva et al 2010;Schornack et al 2009). …”
Section: Pathogenic Processes In Oomycetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many typical small proteins have been identified as signal peptides and genes of these are not homologous to those in any other organisms (Kamuon, 2007;Hogenhout et al, 2009). To date, 15 effector proteins have been identified, most of which are species specific, including 9 Avr proteins (PWL1, PWL2, Avr-Pita, Avr-Piz-t, Avr-Pia, Avr-Pii, Avr-Pik/km/kp, Avr-CO39, and ACE1) and the 6 most recently identified ones: BAS1, BAS2, BAS3, BAS4, S1p1, and MC69 (De Wit et al, 2009;Oliva et al, 2010). AVR-Pita is distributed widely in the protein complex and has high levels of polymorphisms caused by fragment deletion, point mutation, and transposition insertion (Zhou et al, 2007;Jia et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%