2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2016.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent developments in the theoretical, simulational, and experimental studies of the role of water hydrogen bonding in hydrophobic phenomena

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both, the hydrophobic and hydrophilic solvation depend on thermodynamic conditions of the solvent (e.g., pressuretemperature). 51 Thus, changes in the free energy of the system are due to structural and energetic changes in the solvent around each solute molecule, 51,52 and hence, water molecules exhibits a preferred orientation at the hydrophilic or hydrophobic surface. 53 This is linked to the result of Djikaev and Ruckenstein, 51 who computed the effective width of the fluid solvent-solute transition layer (σ) and average density (ρ) therein, where the behavior change of σ and ρ modifies the hydration mechanism depending on the solute-solvent affinity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both, the hydrophobic and hydrophilic solvation depend on thermodynamic conditions of the solvent (e.g., pressuretemperature). 51 Thus, changes in the free energy of the system are due to structural and energetic changes in the solvent around each solute molecule, 51,52 and hence, water molecules exhibits a preferred orientation at the hydrophilic or hydrophobic surface. 53 This is linked to the result of Djikaev and Ruckenstein, 51 who computed the effective width of the fluid solvent-solute transition layer (σ) and average density (ρ) therein, where the behavior change of σ and ρ modifies the hydration mechanism depending on the solute-solvent affinity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal solvent of nature is water, which is the protagonist of hydrophobic effects. Their wide momentousness is exemplified in a variety of phenomena in natural, engineering, and pharmaceutical sciences, such as self-assembly of amphiphilic molecules to biological membranes, , receptor–ligand binding, , catalysis using cavitands, transport through nanopores, as well as protein folding, stability, and function. Having a common foundation in the incompatibility of water and nonpolar solutes, the hydrophobic effects are quite diverse in their physical nature. In particular, they exhibit a characteristic length scale dependence, which is a consequence of the different water structure, dynamics, and fluctuations around small and large hydrophobic objects and leads to an exchange between enthalpic and entropic thermodynamic driving forces …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-polar solutes are usually classified as hydrophobic (Attic Greek: hýdrofor "water" and phóbos for "fear"). The verbalism "hydrophobic effect" gathers the consequences of hydrophobicity that dictate the driving forces for macromolecular conformations and association processes like the aforementioned micelle formation and molecular recognition [7][8][9][10][11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10−12 From a thermodynamic point of view, the hydrophobic effect is related to the Gibbs energy of transferring a nonpolar solute into water. 13 The hydrophobic effect is the most important contribution in the classical aggregation formation models developed by Nagarajan and Ruckenstein 14,15 as well as by Blankschtein et al 16−19 These models 14−19 provide an analytical expression for the Gibbs energy of solutions containing water, surfactant molecules, and aggregates of different aggregation sizes and shapes. Although they 14−19 follow the same concept, the detailed expressions differ from each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the self-assembly of surfactants in an aqueous environment is of high importance in the chemical process industry, for pharmaceutical and cosmetic applications as well as for consumer products and food processing. The most important driving force for the self-aggregation is the so-called hydrophobic effect also causing the limited solubility of nonpolar molecules in water. From a thermodynamic point of view, the hydrophobic effect is related to the Gibbs energy of transferring a nonpolar solute into water . The hydrophobic effect is the most important contribution in the classical aggregation formation models developed by Nagarajan and Ruckenstein , as well as by Blankschtein et al These models provide an analytical expression for the Gibbs energy of solutions containing water, surfactant molecules, and aggregates of different aggregation sizes and shapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%