2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent developments of anthropogenic air pollutant emission inventories in Guangdong province, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, TC was significantly influenced by the regional transport on these days. Specifically, it was expected that SO 2 would be higher at QAI due to the ship emissions and the higher background levels in inland PRD (Li, Yuan, et al, ; Zhong et al, ), which was also confirmed in Patterns 2 and 3 (Table S3). However, in Pattern 1, SO 2 at TC (6.0 ± 1.0 ppbv) significantly surpassed that at QAI (3.9 ± 0.8 ppbv).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Additionally, TC was significantly influenced by the regional transport on these days. Specifically, it was expected that SO 2 would be higher at QAI due to the ship emissions and the higher background levels in inland PRD (Li, Yuan, et al, ; Zhong et al, ), which was also confirmed in Patterns 2 and 3 (Table S3). However, in Pattern 1, SO 2 at TC (6.0 ± 1.0 ppbv) significantly surpassed that at QAI (3.9 ± 0.8 ppbv).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…As shown in Table 4, the uncertainty in the total S-IVOC emissions was very high with a relative error of −79 %-229 % at the 95 % confidence interval, which could be mainly attributed to uncertainties in the S-IVOC emissions of the onroad mobile sources because of the largest correlation coefficient of the on-road mobile S-IVOC emissions with total S-IVOC emissions among all the source categories. It is noteworthy that the uncertainty ranges of the emission inventories of S-IVOCs were wider than those of VOCs and PM 2.5 , which were only −6 %-99 % and −6 %-77 %, respectively (Zhong et al, 2018). For input parameters in the emission model, the correlation coefficients between total S-IVOC emissions and F OC for the on-road mobile sources or ratios of E IVOCs / E POA for all source categories, except biomass burning, were very large, indicating that these parameters were the key sources of high uncertainties in the S-IVOC emission estimates.…”
Section: Uncertainties In S-ivoc Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Based on the different values of model input parameters from previous studies (Table 1), probabilistic distributions representing uncertainty ranges of different parameters, including F OC , E SVOCs/E POA , E IVOCs/E POA , OM/OC, O/C, H/C, and N/C, from different source categories are summarized in Table 2. Additionally, uniform distribution based on the results of uncertainty assessment in Zhong et al (2018) was applied to all source categories of PM 2.5 emission in the present study.…”
Section: Establishment Of the S-ivoc Emission Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…of the total uncertainty in simulated PM 2.5 concentrations ( Figure 6). The primary PM 2.5 emissions generally have high uncertainty in China due to the limited measurements of local emission factors and a dearth of detailed activity data, particularly for fugitive dust, one of the largest contributors to primary PM 2.5 emissions 38 . The key uncertainty sources identified in this case study have previously been uncovered by Huang et al 39 .…”
Section: Uncertainty Attributions Of Pm25mentioning
confidence: 99%