2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-1958-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Developments on Structural Equation Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When using real-world data to verify and evaluate the theoretical model, χ 2 is susceptible to sample size. The larger the sample size, the more significant the results, and the easier to reject the theoretical model ( 55 ). The results of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that all the fitting indexes meet the requirements except for χ 2 / df [Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.064, Root Meansquare Residual (RMR) = 0.03, Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.99, Relative Fitting Index (RFI) = 0.98, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.99, Incremental Fit Index (IFI) = 0.99, Tucker–Lewis Fit Index (TLI) = 0.98, Parsimonious Goodness Fit Index (PGFI) = 0.56, Parsimonious Normed Fit Index (PNFI) = 0.68, Parsimonious Comparative Fit Index (PCFI) = 0.68], which indicated the structure validity is good.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using real-world data to verify and evaluate the theoretical model, χ 2 is susceptible to sample size. The larger the sample size, the more significant the results, and the easier to reject the theoretical model ( 55 ). The results of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that all the fitting indexes meet the requirements except for χ 2 / df [Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.064, Root Meansquare Residual (RMR) = 0.03, Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.99, Relative Fitting Index (RFI) = 0.98, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.99, Incremental Fit Index (IFI) = 0.99, Tucker–Lewis Fit Index (TLI) = 0.98, Parsimonious Goodness Fit Index (PGFI) = 0.56, Parsimonious Normed Fit Index (PNFI) = 0.68, Parsimonious Comparative Fit Index (PCFI) = 0.68], which indicated the structure validity is good.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the soil variables were recorded on the ordinal scale initially, thus we tried to adjust the scale through transformation. Unfortunately, the ordinal scale of the soil physical variables was inappropriate in SEM, which should be performed under the assumption of normality [12]. Therefore, jitter transformation was applied to change the scale from qualitative to quantitative by adding some noise as follows [24]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since frequent use of applications based on big data, several powerful analytical techniques have been developed for specific proposals. SEM has been carried out through two steps, which consists of measurement and structural parts [12,13]. First, the number of variables in the measurement part have effectively reduced to some common factors to prevent an excessive increase in the number of parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%