2023
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202216010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Developments on Understanding Charge Transfer in Molecular Electron Donor‐Acceptor Systems

Abstract: Charge transfer (CT) in molecular electron donor-acceptor systems is pivotal for artificial photosynthesis, photocatalysis, photovoltaics and fundamental photochemistry. We summarized the recent development in study of CT and discussed its application in thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) emitters. The direct experimental proof of the spin multiplicity of the charge separated (CS) state with pulsed laser excited time-resolved electron paramagnetic resonance (TREPR) spectroscopy was discussed. Expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
(341 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in the optimized S 1 structure (Figure S16b), the dihedral angle between the donor and acceptor groups was 84.7°, which was very close to 90°, beneficial to the formation of the CT state. Meanwhile, S 1 was a CT state and T 1 was a LE state (Figure S25), which fully met the requirement of the spin–orbit charge transfer intersystem crossing (SOCT-ISC). For our systems, the transition of S 1 in our systems mixed a large component CT and n → π*. The large component CT reduced the energy gap between S 1 and T 1 , and participation of n → π* resulted in the significant spin–orbit coupling (SOC), which jointly contributed to effective ISC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…As shown in the optimized S 1 structure (Figure S16b), the dihedral angle between the donor and acceptor groups was 84.7°, which was very close to 90°, beneficial to the formation of the CT state. Meanwhile, S 1 was a CT state and T 1 was a LE state (Figure S25), which fully met the requirement of the spin–orbit charge transfer intersystem crossing (SOCT-ISC). For our systems, the transition of S 1 in our systems mixed a large component CT and n → π*. The large component CT reduced the energy gap between S 1 and T 1 , and participation of n → π* resulted in the significant spin–orbit coupling (SOC), which jointly contributed to effective ISC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…[51] In summary, the major channel for (T 1 ) formation is the charge recombination based on a spin-orbit charge-transfer intersystem crossing (SOCT-ISC) mechanism. [52,53] A strong spectral overlap of GSB and fingerprints of (T 1 ) hampers a triplet quantum yield determination via target analyses of the transient absorption spectra. [4] Instead, the triplet quantum yield was approximated by means of singlet oxygen quantum yields (Φ Δ ) using C 60 as a reference.…”
Section: Time-resolved Absorption and Emission Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processes involving charge transfer or separation are ubiquitous in chemical, biological, and material sciences, and in particular, they play a key role in energy production through natural or artificial light-harvesting machineries (e.g., photovoltaic devices). Therefore, a large body of work has been dedicated to the study and understanding of the microscopic factors that govern charge separation in various molecular systems, as well as to the design and making of molecular assemblies, such as organic bulk-heterojunctions, which can efficiently prompt charge separation and hence energy conversion. Despite its importance, however, a simple and convenient method for quantitatively determining the degree of charge separation in molecular systems is lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%