2020
DOI: 10.1126/science.abb7772
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent global decline of CO 2 fertilization effects on vegetation photosynthesis

Abstract: The enhanced vegetation productivity driven by increased concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) [i.e., the CO2 fertilization effect (CFE)] sustains an important negative feedback on climate warming, but the temporal dynamics of CFE remain unclear. Using multiple long-term satellite- and ground-based datasets, we showed that global CFE has declined across most terrestrial regions of the globe from 1982 to 2015, correlating well with changing nutrient concentrations and availability of soil water. Current carbon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
214
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 453 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
10
214
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Phosphorus limitation on terrestrial plant production is traditionally viewed as important, but mainly in lowland tropical regions where soils are generally strongly weathered (Reich & Oleksyn, 2004; Vitousek, 1984; Walker & Syers, 1976). While increasing global syntheses suggest a more wide distribution of terrestrial P limitation on land than previously thought (Augusto et al, 2017; Du et al, 2020; Elser et al, 2007; Hou et al, 2020), the global pattern and magnitude of terrestrial P limitation remain inadequately understood (Fleischer et al, 2019; Turner et al, 2018; Wang et al, 2020). An improved understanding of terrestrial P limitation at the global scale is required for accurately projecting P limitation on future carbon sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems (Du et al, 2020; Fleischer et al, 2019; Hou et al, 2020; Reed et al, 2015; Wieder et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phosphorus limitation on terrestrial plant production is traditionally viewed as important, but mainly in lowland tropical regions where soils are generally strongly weathered (Reich & Oleksyn, 2004; Vitousek, 1984; Walker & Syers, 1976). While increasing global syntheses suggest a more wide distribution of terrestrial P limitation on land than previously thought (Augusto et al, 2017; Du et al, 2020; Elser et al, 2007; Hou et al, 2020), the global pattern and magnitude of terrestrial P limitation remain inadequately understood (Fleischer et al, 2019; Turner et al, 2018; Wang et al, 2020). An improved understanding of terrestrial P limitation at the global scale is required for accurately projecting P limitation on future carbon sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems (Du et al, 2020; Fleischer et al, 2019; Hou et al, 2020; Reed et al, 2015; Wieder et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although CESM1-BGC (like all the other CMIP5 models) can simulate changes in temperature reasonably well, it may not predict precipitation well, particularly for eastern China which is affected by large-scale atmospheric circulations (Huang et al, 2013). In addition, the effects of solar radiation (Yu et al, 2021; and its complex responses to dust aerosol (Fu et al, 2009;Qi et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013) on plant photosynthesis and biomass formation were not considered in this study, which can be another source of uncertainties in the estimated AGB under future climate change. Last but not least, the assumption of space-for-time substitution has been widely debated and challenged (Johnson and Miyanishi, 2008;Walker et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of GPP to CO 2 remains poorly quantified, especially in the tropics, due to the lack of in-situ data and large observational uncertainties (Sun et al, 2019). As a result, process-model-enhanced GPP may be overestimated, due to missing nutrient limitation (He et al, 2017), acclimation processes (Ainsworth & Rogers, 2007) or errors in the coupling of the water and C cycles (Wang et al, 2020). Our analyses estimate increases in both LAI and GPP for much of Brazil, but declines in water-limited regions (e.g.…”
Section: Does Increasing Model Complexity Improve Agreement With Evaluation Information?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is likely a result of CO 2 fertilisation leading to reductions in plant water demand that are explicit in both ACM GPP models. However, it is possible that land surface models like DALEC are overestimating CO 2 fertilisation effect (Wang et al, 2020) highlighting the need for further evaluation and refinement.…”
Section: Which Ecosystem Traits Are Most Strongly Correlated With Simulated Carbon Dynamics?mentioning
confidence: 99%