2001
DOI: 10.1006/icar.2000.6573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Gravity Models as a Result of the Lunar Prospector Mission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
262
0
13

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
14
262
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…If the dominant contribution to the gravity anomaly is from the basalt fill (Phillips et al, 1972), this pattern would suggest an axially syrnmetric, Gaussian-shaped accumulation with the greatest thickness of the basalts near the basin center. The most recent gravity models (Konopliv et al, 1998(Konopliv et al, , 2001; Konopliv and Yuan, 1999), however, show that the anomaly for Serenitatis does not have a "bull's eye" pattern (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Gravitymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If the dominant contribution to the gravity anomaly is from the basalt fill (Phillips et al, 1972), this pattern would suggest an axially syrnmetric, Gaussian-shaped accumulation with the greatest thickness of the basalts near the basin center. The most recent gravity models (Konopliv et al, 1998(Konopliv et al, , 2001; Konopliv and Yuan, 1999), however, show that the anomaly for Serenitatis does not have a "bull's eye" pattern (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Gravitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…la). The positive anomaly is attributed to the uncompensated mare basalts (Phillips et al, 1972) and the presence of a dense mantle "plug" formed by post-impact mantle rebound (Wise and Yates, 1970;Solomon and Head, 1979) (for a summary discussion of the relative contribution of mantle material and the basalt fill to the gravity see (Konopliv et al, 2001). The grid was generated by truncating LP 165P at degree and order 1 10.…”
Section: Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The culmination of a century-long search [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], GW detection is now emerging as a new tool with which to study the Universe, illuminating previously invisible astrophysical phenomena. In parallel, the developments of laser cooling and the laser frequency comb have given rise to optical atomic clocks with accuracies and stabilities at the 10 −18 level [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, due to the synchronous rotation of the Moon around the Earth, all derived models lack information from the far-side. The most recent and probably best model available is the JPL Lunar Prospector mission result LP150Q (Konopliv et al, 2001) which is complete to degree and order 150 of a spherical harmonic representation. The model can resolve smallscale features up to 36 km half-wavelength with an approximate accuracy of about 30 mGal on the near-side, but, due to the inhomogeneous input data which require strong constraints in the solution process, the model errors are definitely much larger (up to 200 mGal) on the farside (Wiezcorek, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%