2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05092-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent increase of surface particulate matter concentrations in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, Korea

Abstract: Recent changes of surface particulate matter (PM) concentration in the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA), South Korea, are puzzling. The long-term trend of surface PM concentration in the SMA declined in the 2000s, but since 2012 its concentrations have tended to incline, which is coincident with frequent severe hazes in South Korea. This increase puts the Korean government’s emission reduction efforts in jeopardy. This study reports that interannual variation of surface PM concentration in South Korea is closely … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
90
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
5
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Improvements in the PM 2.5 achievement ratio result from complex interactions between Japanese and Chinese emission-reduction measures, and it is not yet clear which factor has a greater contribution. This lack of clarity arises because most PM 2.5 studies are focused on an individual country, and quantitative evaluations or correlation analyses of the impacts of environmental improvement on downwind regions (beyond national borders) have rarely been published [18][19][20][21] . Studying the relationship between decreased PM 2.5 concentrations in China and its downwind regions and clarifying quantitative source/receptor (S/R) relationships are essential for establishing better environmental policies.Remote island observations of aerosol chemical compositions off the west coast of Japan (eastern edge of the East China Sea) indicate that sulfate concentrations have decreased significantly, consistent with the decrease in SO 2 emissions in China.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in the PM 2.5 achievement ratio result from complex interactions between Japanese and Chinese emission-reduction measures, and it is not yet clear which factor has a greater contribution. This lack of clarity arises because most PM 2.5 studies are focused on an individual country, and quantitative evaluations or correlation analyses of the impacts of environmental improvement on downwind regions (beyond national borders) have rarely been published [18][19][20][21] . Studying the relationship between decreased PM 2.5 concentrations in China and its downwind regions and clarifying quantitative source/receptor (S/R) relationships are essential for establishing better environmental policies.Remote island observations of aerosol chemical compositions off the west coast of Japan (eastern edge of the East China Sea) indicate that sulfate concentrations have decreased significantly, consistent with the decrease in SO 2 emissions in China.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSA emission parameterization of Monahan et al (1986) is commonly used to model sea-salt emissions of coarse particles (e.g. Sartelet et al, 2012;Solazzo et al, 2017;Kim et al, 2017). However, the strong non-linearity of the source function versus wind speed (power law with an exponent of 3.41) may lead to an overestimation of emissions at high-speed regimes, as suggested by Guelle et al 15 (2001) and Witek et al (2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To overcome the aforementioned limitations and to perform computationally efficient contribution estimation, we used a nested modeling domain in this study ( Figure 1): an outer domain with a 27-km horizontal grid resolution to cover major emission regions in Northeast Asia and an inner domain with a 9-km horizontal grid resolution over the Korean Peninsula. For the temporal scale, we note that recent meteorological changes in Northeast Asia had affected air quality in the region [13,14]. Therefore, we attempted to account for the effect of interannual variability of meteorology on the estimated contributions by conducting 8-year-long (2010-2017) simulations in this study.…”
Section: The Modeling Domain and Study Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the modeling period, the model underestimated the 2-m temperatures by 0.4 • C on average (the correlation coefficient (R) between the modeled and observed values was 1.0), and the normalized mean bias (NMB) was −4% to 1.3% and R was 0.95 to 0.99 for the seasonal analysis of the 2-m temperatures. Moreover, the model overestimated the 10-m wind speeds by 0.5 m/s on average (R = 0.8), which likely resulted in the faster transport of air pollutants in the model [13,31]. Especially, the 10-m wind speeds were overestimated in the winter by up to 0.8 m/s.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of the Wrf Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%