2012
DOI: 10.1639/007-2745-115.3.465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent literature on lichens—226

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the issue of the correct approach to the illegality defence, the flexible approach exemplified by the majority's reasoning in Hounga and endorsed by Lords Toulson and Hodge in Bilta is not contrary to Tinsley. Further, the strict approach is 'indiscriminate' 78 and 'will often produce disproportionately harsh consequences'. 79 Moreover, the highest courts in various common law jurisdictions have adopted a flexible approach, 80 which decisions the Court would 'undoubtedly wish to examine' 81 in the future, and which 'merit reading'.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the issue of the correct approach to the illegality defence, the flexible approach exemplified by the majority's reasoning in Hounga and endorsed by Lords Toulson and Hodge in Bilta is not contrary to Tinsley. Further, the strict approach is 'indiscriminate' 78 and 'will often produce disproportionately harsh consequences'. 79 Moreover, the highest courts in various common law jurisdictions have adopted a flexible approach, 80 which decisions the Court would 'undoubtedly wish to examine' 81 in the future, and which 'merit reading'.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, a separate exception is not needed. 78 Second, the importance of Montgomery as a development from Sidaway once again becomes pertinent. One argument that might be made is that because of the emphasis on the continuum of development from Sidaway, especially from Lord Scarman's judgment, and the similarities of the formulations of the therapeutic privilege, Montgomery has not done anything to narrow the range of circumstances in which the therapeutic privilege, and thus the professional-patient test, may apply.…”
Section: Bolam's Potential Relevance (1): the Therapeutic Privilegementioning
confidence: 99%