2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Open Issues in Coarse Grained Force Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common approach to choose pseudo-atoms is the Martini approach, where four non-hydrogen atoms are represented by a single pseudo atom ( Marrink et al, 2007 ). However, the Martini approach has several noted drawbacks ( Souza et al, 2020 ), especially when applied to MOF frameworks that contain highly symmetric or infinitely long chain structures as building units and possible disorder ( Cheetham et al, 2016 ), which prove it difficult to apply directly to framework structures. Nonetheless, Dürholt et al reported a proof of concept approach of a parameterised coarse grained model for a Cu paddlewheel based MOF, HKUST-1 ( Dürholt et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Simulation Approaches To Treat the Effect Of Crystal Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common approach to choose pseudo-atoms is the Martini approach, where four non-hydrogen atoms are represented by a single pseudo atom ( Marrink et al, 2007 ). However, the Martini approach has several noted drawbacks ( Souza et al, 2020 ), especially when applied to MOF frameworks that contain highly symmetric or infinitely long chain structures as building units and possible disorder ( Cheetham et al, 2016 ), which prove it difficult to apply directly to framework structures. Nonetheless, Dürholt et al reported a proof of concept approach of a parameterised coarse grained model for a Cu paddlewheel based MOF, HKUST-1 ( Dürholt et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Simulation Approaches To Treat the Effect Of Crystal Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multibody terms need to be introduced for structure modeling. Moreover, the site–site interaction potentials of most coarse-grained force fields are usually too “sticky”, this resulting in too compact modeled structures [ 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 ]. The “stickiness” arises from interaction imbalance, which can be caused by the absence of specific cross Lennard–Jones parameters for pairs of particles of different size or overly weak bond force constants [ 76 ].…”
Section: Theory and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure has been summarized and illustrated with examples in our recent review article [ 26 ]. This feature solves part of the problem of force field “stickiness” pointed out in [ 75 ], because the force field contains explicit terms that couple the backbone-local and backbone-electrostatic conformational states, which prevent overly compact local chain fragments [ 80 ]. Another way of including the multibody terms is to introduce expressions derived based on structural regularities in crystal structures [ 60 , 81 ] or on a heuristic basis [ 82 , 83 ].…”
Section: Theory and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 83 However, molecular simulations also have limitations, just like any experiment or analytical procedure. 84 Considering the situation of lipid monolayers, there are issues with the computation of water surface tension and phospholipid monolayer surface pressure. 85 The phase separation of phospholipids monolayer from the experiment cannot be seen from simulation.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%