2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent progress and challenges of multi-stack fuel cell systems: Fault detection and reconfiguration, energy management strategies, and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current EMS is mainly applied in hybrid energy systems of fuel cells and batteries, while there are few EMS solutions for MFCS, mainly existing in academic literature. A great quantity of research works on system modeling and simulation of multi-stack energy management have been carried out in recent years [3][4][5]. Li et al [6] proposed a power allocation strategy for incremental output.…”
Section: Multi-stack Energy Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current EMS is mainly applied in hybrid energy systems of fuel cells and batteries, while there are few EMS solutions for MFCS, mainly existing in academic literature. A great quantity of research works on system modeling and simulation of multi-stack energy management have been carried out in recent years [3][4][5]. Li et al [6] proposed a power allocation strategy for incremental output.…”
Section: Multi-stack Energy Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1. MFCS architecture.A great quantity of research works on system modeling and simulation of multi-stack energy management have been carried out in recent years[3][4][5]. Li et al[6] proposed a power allocation strategy for incremental output.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four cases are reported varying the electric efficiency of the cogenerator and the COP of the HTHP for two typical values (0.35 and 0.45, 3 and 4, respectively) to consider the availability of different technologies. el,cog=0.35 is typical for a GT or PAFC, while 0.45 is typical for an ICE or MCFC [29]. COPHTHP=3 is a typical value for newer refrigerant (e.g., R1234ze(E)) while 4 is a typical value for ammonia [30].…”
Section: Description Of the Cchp+hthp Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%