2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-03630-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent progress and challenges with 3D printing of patterned hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It creates 3D structures by solidifying the liquid‐state resin using heat or light, and the geometry of these structures is predetermined to fit desired applications, even forming rather complex architectures with the desired wettability. [ 58–61 ] It is advantageous to construct heterogeneous wettability surfaces through altering the distribution and orientation of the fabricated microstructures ( Figure a). Both hydrophilic and hydrophobic materials are suitable for the additive manufacturing process, and a further surface modification process can also be utilized for specific functionalities.…”
Section: Construction Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It creates 3D structures by solidifying the liquid‐state resin using heat or light, and the geometry of these structures is predetermined to fit desired applications, even forming rather complex architectures with the desired wettability. [ 58–61 ] It is advantageous to construct heterogeneous wettability surfaces through altering the distribution and orientation of the fabricated microstructures ( Figure a). Both hydrophilic and hydrophobic materials are suitable for the additive manufacturing process, and a further surface modification process can also be utilized for specific functionalities.…”
Section: Construction Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 59 , 60 ] With the development of science and technology, many advanced methods have been put forward to prepare materials especially biomaterials with specific wettability such as superwetting materials and SLIPS. [ 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 ,…”
Section: Fabrication Of Biomaterials With Specific Wettabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among various physical methods, 3D printing is an emerging and revolutionary technology with the advantages of efficiency, controllability, and no need of complex procedure, which has attracted great interest and research in academia, industry and other areas since its appearance. [ 61 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ] With the progress of manufacturing, 3D printing has been applicable for fabricating wettability surfaces with nanoscale features by laser polymerization, [ 65 , 66 , 67 ] which is also called direct laser writing or two‐photon laser writing. Based on 3D printing, wettability surfaces with different patterns such as pillar structure, [ 68 ] eggbeater‐like structure, [ 61 ] and spine structure [ 69 ] have been developed and demonstrated superwetting performance.…”
Section: Fabrication Of Biomaterials With Specific Wettabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, commonly used advanced lithography methods (e.g., deep reactive ion etching [ 23 ], thermal reflow [ 24 ], inclined UV lithography [ 25 ], and focused ion beam [ 6 , 26 ]) to achieve these 3D shapes also suffer from limitations as they are equipment-/environment-demanding, expensive, and low-throughput. Recent additive manufacturing techniques (e.g., Inkjet printing [ 27 , 28 ] and direct laser writing [ 29 ]) for manufacturing 3D MSAs also face challenges such as nonuniformity, nozzle clogging (that affects the reproducibility of the prints), material choice limitation, complex operation, and low surface finish [ 28 , 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%