2017
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201703002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Progress in Bionic Condensate Microdrop Self‐Propelling Surfaces

Abstract: interest has focused on utilizing the lowadhesivity nature of superhydrophobic surfaces for the rapid removal of condensate microdrops, as this has significance in fundamental research and technological innovation. Example applications are the enhancement of condensation heat transfer for high-efficiency thermal management and energy utilization, [20][21][22][23][24][25] energy-effective antifreezing for airconditioner heat exchangers and aircraft wings, [26][27][28] and electrostatic energy harvesting. [29] I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be because under the dew conditions, the water‐harvesting performance is determined by both the water capturing rate and the water removal efficiency, which require the surface to exhibit different wettability for each contribution; wettable surfaces favor droplet nucleation, whereas SHPo surfaces favor droplet removal. Since the droplet nucleation barrier on the SHPo surface is higher than that on the SHPi surface, the low condensation rate limits the overall water collection efficiency; additionally, if the droplets depart from the SHPo surface via coalescence‐induced jumping, the departing droplets would be evaporated in the air, causing a larger loss of water collection, despite fast droplet departure frequency on the SHPo surface …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be because under the dew conditions, the water‐harvesting performance is determined by both the water capturing rate and the water removal efficiency, which require the surface to exhibit different wettability for each contribution; wettable surfaces favor droplet nucleation, whereas SHPo surfaces favor droplet removal. Since the droplet nucleation barrier on the SHPo surface is higher than that on the SHPi surface, the low condensation rate limits the overall water collection efficiency; additionally, if the droplets depart from the SHPo surface via coalescence‐induced jumping, the departing droplets would be evaporated in the air, causing a larger loss of water collection, despite fast droplet departure frequency on the SHPo surface …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by nature, [ 4–7 ] superhydrophobic surfaces with extreme repellency to water have attracted significant interest, owing to their potential applications in anti‐condensation, anti‐frosting, anti‐icing, anti‐fogging, and self‐cleaning activities. [ 8–20 ] Biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces can be prepared via different approaches, including reactive ion etching, [ 21 ] chemical/physical processing, [ 22–25 ] lithographing, [ 26,27 ] and coating. [ 28–33 ] Among these approaches, the coating approach has been widely applied, owing to its simple preparation process, low equipment requirement, and wide application range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, there are two forms of water condensation of moisture from the air: filmwise condensation and dropwise condensation. [17][18][19] Filmwise condensation refers to the condensate liquid forming a continuous film, while dropwise condensation refers to the harvesting of condensate liquids in the form of droplets. In consideration of heat-transfer efficiency during phase-change, dropwise condensation is over ten times more than that of filmwise condensation, and the heat-transfer performance of dropwise condensation can be further improved by fabricating micro/nano-structures on the substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%