2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent progress in integrated fixed-film activated sludge process for wastewater treatment: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 192 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure (3) shows BOD removal efficiency, in start-up stage, the removal efficiency was low at the beginning as bacteria needed time to be adapted to the new medium. After two weeks of the start-up stage, the removal efficiency ranged between 62 -87%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure (3) shows BOD removal efficiency, in start-up stage, the removal efficiency was low at the beginning as bacteria needed time to be adapted to the new medium. After two weeks of the start-up stage, the removal efficiency ranged between 62 -87%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge System (IFAS) is a hybrid system considered as one of the solutions that can enable us to enhance the existing wastewater treatment plants [3]. It combines both the suspended and attached growth in the same reactor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effluent ammonium concentration was as low as 0.03 ± 0.01 mg/L for both the RBC and RBC-ME, indicating a proficient nitrification process. An increase in the discharge nitrate value can be ascribed to the nitrifying bacteria activity [3]. Some reports have described that an RBC can undergo aerobic denitrification.…”
Section: Biological Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suspended flocs (employed in the conventional activated sludge (CAS) process) and attached biofilm (employed in trickling filters and rotating biological contactor (RBC)) are the two types of aggregates. Both the suspended flocs and the attached biofilm processes are established in full-scale wastewater treatment processes [3]. RBC-also referred to as biofilm reactors-offers a substitute to the CAS process [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DPR can remove phosphorus and nitrite/nitrate simultaneously with limited chemical oxygen demand (COD) and reduced aeration, but it demands complicated control without practical application so far (Jin et al, 2017). Some variants of existing mature technologies such as integrated fixed-film activated sludge process (Waqas et al, 2020), and sequencing batch membrane photobioreactor seem more promising for rapid full-scale application (Lau et al, 2019;Sheng et al, 2017)In practice, nitrogen removal from municipal wastewater still relies on biological nitrification and denitrification while phosphorus removal depends on either enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) or chemical precipitation by aluminium, ferric or calcium salts. EBPR is more environmentally friendly without or with little chemical consumption, but it has relatively lower phosphorus removal efficiency and less performance stability compared with chemical precipitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%